Times Union (Op-Ed): To boost voter participation, simplify wording on ballots

Times Union (Op-Ed): To boost voter participation, simplify wording on ballots

In 2024, voters will again be faced with a slew of statewide ballot proposals on important topics. If we don’t pass the plain language bill before then, we run the risk that voters will be confused and discouraged and opt out of the process. Voters of all languages and literacy levels deserve equal access at the ballot box. 

It has happened to all of us: We’ve gotten to the ballot box, cast our vote for our candidates of choice, and flipped the ballot over only to be confronted with small, jumbled paragraphs full of legalese that make us go, “What does that even mean?”

Those paragraphs are important ballot initiatives. They can directly impact voting, reproductive and environmental rights, and it shouldn’t take a law degree to understand them.

That’s why we’re pushing New York lawmakers to pass a bill this session that would require statewide ballot questions to be written and presented to voters in a simple yes-or-no format with easily understood language.

Right now, the law requires that ballot measures be “clear and coherent.” But for whom? In New York state, 3.9 million adults lack English language proficiency, basic literacy and numeracy skills, or a high school diploma. That’s almost 20 percent of our state’s population.

Too many New York voters, regardless of education or reading level, don’t understand what they are asked to vote on. Often they do not vote on the measure at all, or vote against it because they’re not sure what is being asked. Convoluted ballot language is undemocratic.

Don’t believe us? Read this actual ballot proposal from November 2021: “The proposed amendment would delete from the current provision on absentee ballots the requirement that an absentee voter must be unable to appear at the polls by reason of absence from the county or illness or physical disability. Shall the proposed amendment be approved?”

If you’re left scratching your head, you’re not alone. No wonder over 350,000 New Yorkers didn’t even vote on this ballot proposal. Here’s what it would look like if the plain language bill is passed: “Should New York State allow no-excuse absentee voting? This change in the constitution allows all eligible voters to use an absentee ballot. It removes the requirement for an excuse of absence from the county, illness or physical disability. A YES vote allows any voter to use an absentee ballot. A NO vote keeps the excuse for absentee voting.

See? Much simpler and easy to follow.

The plain language requirements proposed in this bill would establish clear standards for readability and uniformity and guarantee that language on the ballot would be no more complicated than an eighth-grade reading comprehension level. The question would always be in a simple yes-or-no format. This will also facilitate easier and more accurate translation of ballot questions into languages other than English.

Civic engagement strengthens communities. With strong voter participation, we can elect people who develop policies that more accurately represent the interests of their communities. Making the ballot easier to understand is essential to that goal.

In 2024, voters will again be faced with a slew of statewide ballot proposals on important topics. If we don’t pass the plain language bill before then, we run the risk that voters will be confused and discouraged and opt out of the process. Voters of all languages and literacy levels deserve equal access at the ballot box.

Susan Lerner is the executive director of Common Cause/NY. Susan Stamler is the executive director of United Neighborhood Houses.

 

To view this piece at the Times Union, click here.