High Court Orders Second Look at Virginia Redistricting Plan

Did Lawmakers Set Out to Dilute Black Voting Strength?

Posted by Dale Eisman on March 1, 2017

The Supreme Court has ordered a second look at claims that Virginia legislators set out to dilute the voting power of black citizens when they drew new boundaries for 11 state legislative districts following the 2010 census.

A lower court had dismissed the racial gerrymandering allegations, but the justices said it failed to give sufficient weight to evidence that could have demonstrated an improper racial motivation.

The decision on Wednesday in Bethune-Hill v Virginia State Board of Elections, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, said the three federal judges who heard the case originally should have studied conditions district-by-district as part of a “holistic analysis” to determine the legislators’ predominant motive in adjusting the boundaries.

Justice Kennedy’s opinion may indicate some willingness by the high court to reevaluate the constitutionality of partisan gerrymanders.  Several challenges to that practice are in the legal pipeline, including Whitford v. Gill, which originated in Wisconsin; Common Cause v. Rucho, a challenge to partisan gerrymandering in North Carolina; and Shapiro v. McManus, a case filed by a Common Cause activist in Maryland.

Common Cause, along with New Virginia Majority, filed an amicus brief in Bethune-Hill when the case was before the District Court in 2015.  The brief included analysis by scholars at SUNY Binghamton, including elections expert Prof. Michael D. McDonald, that graded the plan approved by Virginia lawmakers and potential alternatives.  The study concluded that alternatives were available that would have ensured protection of plaintiffs’ – and others so situated – equal protection rights under the Constitution. 

“Racial gerrymandering deprives voters of their voices in elections” said Kathay Feng, Common Cause’s national redistricting director.  “Like partisan gerrymandering, these schemes benefit some voters over others, resulting in the manipulation of elections.  Such practices fundamentally harm our democracy.  We applaud this decision and anticipate that the federal court will evaluate these districts with the ‘holistic’ approach required and strike down these racially-gerrymandered lines.”   


Office: Common Cause National, Common Cause Virginia

Issues: Voting and Elections

Tags: Common Cause v. Rucho

Leave a Comment

  Get news & updates






If you respond and have not already registered, you will receive periodic updates and communications from Common Cause.


What's this?

   Please leave this field empty

Take Action

The Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

Tell Congress to fix the court’s bad decision!

Take action.


Give Today

Join the Community

Find Common Cause Activists in your area.

Add Me to the Map