Illinois Court Delivers Major Win for Police Accountability

The Illinois Appellate Court has upheld a ruling requiring the Chicago Police Board to hold public disciplinary hearings for serious misconduct, marking a significant victory for transparency and accountability.

Illinois Court Upholds Public Hearings for Serious Police Misconduct

On August 8, 2025, the Illinois Appellate Court delivered a major win for police accountability and transparency. A three-judge panel upheld a lower court ruling requiring the Chicago Police Board to conduct disciplinary proceedings for serious police misconduct—cases involving separation or suspensions over 365 days—in public.

This means officers accused of theft, violence against civilians, or other serious abuses of power can no longer shield these proceedings from public view.

Common Cause Illinois Joined the Fight for Transparency

Common Cause Illinois joined this fight last year, signing onto an amicus brief in support of transparency. Our involvement, initiated through our partners at Color of Change, reflects our deep commitment to both civil rights and civil liberties and to anti-corruption and accountability. Police officers are public servants, and the public has the right to see when they are accused of serious misconduct—especially in a city with a long history of abuse disproportionately impacting Black and Brown communities.

This Decision Is a Victory for Democracy

This decision is a victory for democracy. Transparency in policing ensures that government officials cannot operate in the shadows, evading scrutiny from the communities they serve. The symbolism of our amicus brief being filed on Election Day is powerful: the same day we worked to protect the right to vote, we also stood for the public’s right to know. True democracy demands both.

Possible Appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court

While the case may still be appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court, this ruling reinforces a critical principle: public policy favors openness when it comes to holding law enforcement accountable. The implications extend far beyond Chicago, touching on national debates over public officials’ anonymity and the balance between officer safety and public interest.

Close

  • Close

    Hello! It looks like you're joining us from {state}.

    Want to see what's happening in your state?

    Go to Common Cause {state}