Take Action

Get Common Cause Updates

Get breaking news and updates from Common Cause.

Take Action

Join the thousands across the country who instantly rally when there is a threat to our democracy.

Volunteer

Join the thousands across the country who instantly rally when there is a threat to our democracy.

Donate

Make a contribution to support Common Cause today.

Find Your State

Introduction

Most of us believe that for democracy to work for all of us, it must include all of us. This election season, we saw voters across the country stand with and for each other, rejecting attempts to divide us based on what we look like, where we come from or where we live.

Despite the coronavirus pandemic and the deliberate barriers set to silence the voices of Black people and people struggling to make ends meet, voters turned out in record numbers to pick new leaders and pass ballot measures that shift power to the people and away from politicians.

Voters in states such as California, Colorado, Oregon, Nevada and Virginia who elected Democractic presidential nominee Joe Biden also overwhelmingly supported grassroots, citizen-led ballot measures that expand the right to vote and protect the people’s voice in government. 

This rides a wave of democracy and political reform in the last five years during which voters approved more than 30 democracy-reform ballot measures that move us forward together toward a more representative and equitable system of government. 

Here are quick takes on our top five successful democracy-reform ballot measures from November 2020:

  • With a stunning 78% of the vote, Oregon voters cleared the way for first-ever campaign finance laws by enabling state and local governments to enact commonsense money in politics reforms. Oregon is one of just a few states that has no limits on what an individual can give to candidates, leading to special interests and big donors have a larger voice in Oregon government.
  • Colorado voters said that voters should decide the winner of the presidential election. The state joins the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact to ensure the winner of the popular vote actually wins the presidential election.
  • A resounding 66% of Virginia voters decided to end partisan gerrymandering by approving a constitutional amendment to create the state’s first-ever citizen-led redistricting commission. Going forward, people will choose their politicians, not the other way around.
  • California voters restored the right to vote to people on parole with felony convictions. Californians who have completed their prison term can fully participate in our democracy by restoring their right to vote.
  • With 64% of the vote, Nevada voters enshrined the right to vote and cast a ballot free from intimidation in the state constitution. They sent a clear message that nothing should stand between a voter and the ballot box.

While there were big wins at the ballot box, there were also some disappointing losses. Cynical, white nationalist efforts to amend the state constitutions to create justification for onerous voting policies prevailed in Alabama, Florida, and Colorado. And voters in Missouri repealed key provisions of the voter-approved Clean Missouri measure. 


Check the guide below for complete ballot results.

Select a reform below to view all the democracy-reform ballot measures by state or view all the ballot measures below.

Money in Politics & Ethics
Voting & Elections
Redistricting & Representation
Direct Democracy

 MONEY IN POLITICS & ETHICS

The following ballot measures focus on creating a more balanced democracy where everyday people’s voices are heard and big special interests do not dominate our politics.
In Baltimore County, Maryland, voters approved the creation of a public financing system for county candidates, similar to programs established in Baltimore City, Montgomery Country, Howard County, and Prince George’s County. In Oregon, voters passed a measure that will open the door to needed campaign finance reform by enabling the legislature and local governments to enact commonsense money in politics reforms and strengthen campaign finance transparency. Oregon is one of just a few states that has no limits on what an individual can give to candidates, leading to special interests and big donors have a larger voice in Oregon government.

Alaska – Amendment 2

SUPPORT

“If passed, Amendment 2 would strengthen Alaska’s campaign finance disclosure laws, replace partisan primaries with a top-four primary system for state and congressional offices, and establish ranked choice voting for all general elections.”

UPDATE: Amendment 2 passed.

Learn More At Alaskans for Better Elections >>

Maryland – Baltimore County – Question A

SUPPORT

“If passed, Question A would amend the county charter to establish a campaign public financing fund to enable candidates in the county to run for office without relying on large or corporate donors. A similar measure passed in the city of Baltimore in 2018 with 75% of voters voting in support. Howard County, Montgomery County, and Prince George’s County have also adopted similar programs in recent years.”

UPDATE: Question A passed. 

Learn More At Baltimore County Fair Elections >>

Oregon – Measure 107

SUPPORT

“If passed, Measure 107 would amend the Oregon’s state constitution to authorize the state legislature and local governments to enact laws limiting campaign contributions and expenditures, require disclosure campaign contributions and spending, and increase transparency for political advertisements.”

UPDATE: Measure 107 passed. 

Learn More At Fair & Honest Elections >>

VOTING & ELECTIONS

Unfortunately, three cynical, white nationalist efforts to amend the state constitutions in Alabama, Florida, and Colorado prevailed. Voters supported measures that provide the right to vote to citizens who are 18 years or older. The state constitutions already provide that right to citizens, so at best these measures will do nothing, and at the worst they open an avenue to harass or intimidate immigrants who are eligible to vote. Youths were also disenfranchised by those measures, in addition to a failed attempt in California to extend the right to vote in primaries to people who will turn 18 by the general election.

Alabama – Amendment 1

OPPOSE

“If passed, Amendment 1 would unnecessarily amend Alabama’s state constitution to state that “only a citizen” of the U.S. who is 18 years old or older can vote in Alabama. The Alabama Constitution already states that “every citizen” in the state who is 18 years old or older can vote in Alabama.”

UPDATE: Amendment 1 passed. 

Learn More At “Ballotpedia: Alabama Amendment 1, Citizenship Requirement for Voting Measure (2020)” >>

California – Proposition 17

SUPPORT

“If passed, Proposition 17 would amend the California state constitution to restore the right to vote to people on parole with felony convictions.”

UPDATE: Proposition 17 passed. 

Learn More At Free The Vote CA >>

California – Proposition 18

SUPPORT

“If passed, Proposition 18 would amend the California state constitution to allow 17-year-olds who will be 18 at the time of the next general election to vote in primary elections and special elections.”

UPDATE: Proposition 18 was defeated. 

Learn More At Yes on 18 – Vote for Our Future >>

Colorado – Proposition 113

SUPPORT

“If passed, Proposition 113 would have Colorado join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Once enough states join the compact to create an Electoral College majority (270 electoral votes), Colorado’s electoral votes would be allocated to the winner of the national popular vote in the presidential election. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an effort to ensure the winner of the popular vote wins the presidential election.”

UPDATE: Proposition 113 passed. 

Learn More At Yes on National Popular Vote >>

Colorado – Amendment 76

OPPOSE

“If passed, Amendment 76 would unnecessarily amend Colorado’s state constitution to state that “only a citizen” of the U.S. who is 18 years old or older can vote in Colorado. The Colorado Constitution already states that “every citizen” in the state who is 18 years old or older can vote; this measure, if passed, would also block the state law that allows 17 year olds to vote in primary elections.”

UPDATE: Amendment 76 passed. 

Learn More At The Campaign for Real Election Protection >>

Florida – Amendment 1

OPPOSE

“If passed, Amendment 1 would unnecessarily amend Florida’s state constitution to state that “only a citizen” of the U.S. who is 18 years old or older can vote in Florida.”

UPDATE: Amendment 1 passed.

Learn More At “Ballotpedia: Florida Amendment 1, Citizen Requirement for Voting Initiative (2020)” >>

Florida – Amendment 3

NO POSITION

“If passed, Amendment 3 would establish a top-two open primary system for primary elections for state legislators, the governor, attorney general, chief financial officer, and commissioner of agriculture in Florida.”

UPDATE: Amendment 3 was defeated.

Learn More At “Ballotpedia: Florida Amendment 3, Top-Two Open Primaries for State Offices Initiative (2020)” >>

Massachusetts – Question 2

SUPPORT

“If passed, Question 2 would establish ranked choice voting in primary and general elections in state, federal, and certain county races, beginning in 2022.”

UPDATE: Question 2 was defeated.

Learn More At Yes on 2: Ranked Choice Voting >>

Nevada – Question 4

SUPPORT

“If passed, Question 4 would add Nevada’s declaration of voters’ rights to the state’s constitution, including guaranting Nevada voters a constitutional right to vote without intimidation, threat, or coercion and equal access to the elections system without discrimination, among other important voting rights reforms.”

UPDATE: Question 4 passed.

Learn More At “Ballotpedia: Nevada Question 4, State Constitutional Rights of Voters Amendment (2020)” >>

REDISTRICTING & REPRESENTATION

Ballot measures on who should draw voting districts — the people or the politicians — had split results. First the good news: In Virginia, voters decided to end partisan gerrymandering by approving a constitutional amendment to create Virginia’s first-ever citizen-led redistricting commission. In contrast, Missouri voters repealed key portions of the Clean Missouri Amendment and gave politicians the power to draw their own districts once again.

New Jersey – Public Question 3

NO POSITION

“If passed, Public Question 3 would delay the redrawing of legislative district boundaries if the federal census count of the New Jersey population is delayed. Under this measure, if census data is not received by February 15, 2020, New Jersey will delay its legislative redistricting process and the current voting maps will remain in place until 2023.”

UPDATE: Public Question 3 passed.

Learn More At “Ballotpedia: New Jersey Public Question 3, Delayed State Legislative Redistricting Amendment (2020)” >>

Missouri – Amendment 3

OPPOSE

“If passed, Amendment 3 would repeal the redistricting reform sections of the Clean Missouri initiative, which was passed by voters in 2018. Instead of using a nonpartisan demographer, Amendment 3 would revert the redistricting process back to a partisan process controlled by the legislature. It could also block Missourians who are not citizens or of voting-age from being counted in the redistricting process.”

UPDATE: Public Amendment 3 passed.

Learn More At Clean Missouri >>

Virginia – Question 1

SUPPORT

“If passed, Question 1 would take the power of congressional and state legislative redistricting out of the hands of the legislature and instead create a bipartisan, citizen-led commission and new rules to control the redistricting process.”

UPDATE: Question 1 passed.

Learn More At FairMaps Virginia >>

DIRECT DEMOCRACY

In big wins for direct democracy, voters in Arkansas, Florida and North Dakota soundly defeated attempts to make it harder for citizens to either put questions on the ballot or to pass those questions. For some context, in Florida this win is important because in 2018 voters used direct democracy to pass a ballot measure that restored the right to vote to felons who completed their sentences. Some leaders have tried to block implementation of this social justice reform, including running this failed attempt to make it harder for grassroots organizers to mount successful ballot campaigns. 

Arkansas – Amendment 3

OPPOSE

“If passed, Amendment 3 would make it harder for Arkansas voters to collect petition signatures to put initiatives on the ballot. This is a cynical effort to silence the voices of Arkansasans and remove a check on the power of state politicians.”

UPDATE: Amendment 3 was defeated.

Learn More At Protect AR Voices >>

Florida – Amendment 4

OPPOSE

“If passed, Amendment 4 would require voter-approved ballot initiatives be approved by voters in a second statewide vote to become effective. Florida law already requires a supermajority vote (60%) for a measure to pass; Amendment 4 would require a second statewide vote, making it far more difficult and expensive to advance constitutional amendments.”

UPDATE: Amendment 4 was defeated.

Learn More At Ballotpedia and NoNumber4.org (League of Women Voters of Florida website)

North Dakota – Measure 2

OPPOSE

“If passed, Measure 2 would require any ballot measure passed by voters to be approved by the legislature. If the legislature does not approve the measure, the issue will be placed on the ballot again to become effective if approved by voters a second time.”

UPDATE: Measure 2 was defeated.

Learn More At Protect ND >>

Join the movement over 1.5 million strong for democracy

Demand a democracy that works for us. Sign up for breaking news and updates.