Redistricting

Every 10 years, state legislatures re-draw the boundaries of Congressional and legislative districts. Redistricting is supposed to reflect changes in population and ensure that everyone is fairly represented.

But politicians draw districts to give themselves or their party an unfair advantage. Common Cause believes voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.

We're working to create better ways to draw districts that fairly represent your state's communities, whether that is independent commissions, non-partisan state staff, or clear Constitutional rules for how lines should be drawn.

Who draws your congressional and state legislative districts?


Red: Independent Commission
Orange: Politician Commission
Green: Advisory Commission
Purple: Backup Commission if Legislature fails to draw districts
Gray: Legislature

Make a donation today in support of our work to end political gerrymandering for good!

In the Courts

Common Cause v. Rucho: Common Cause is the plaintiff in a challenge to North Carolina’s congressional map. After the map was struck down as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander last year, leaders in the legislature announced that they would redraw districts with the explicit intent to ensure that 10 of 13 remain in Republican control. Common Cause sued on the grounds that the new districts are an illegal partisan gerrymander. The trial will begin on June 26, 2017. If we win at trial and in the U.S. Supreme Court, where the case will eventually go, this has the potential to end the gerrymandering of congressional districts nationwide. Check the Common Cause v. Rucho home page for more information.

Whitford v. Gill: Last year, the Campaign Legal Center won a historic victory when a federal court struck down Wisconsin’s State Assembly map as an illegal partisan gerrymander. Wisconsin has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the case is likely to be heard in the high court later this year. Common Cause is one of the lead organizations in charge of managing amicus briefs supporting the plaintiffs’ efforts. It is essential that briefs demonstrate the broad and bipartisan support for an end to the manipulation of our legislative districts.

Benisek v. Lamone: In a case originally brought by a Common Cause Maryland member, plaintiffs are challenging Maryland’s congressional map, stating that it represents an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. Following the 2010 census, the Democratic governor and Democrats in the legislature successfully conspired to draw districts that would eliminate one of the state’s two Republican members of Congress. After a unanimous victory in the U.S. Supreme Court allowing the case to be heard, the case will proceed to trial this year. Common Cause filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court and at the early stages of the trial court process.

In the States

Common Cause is leading the fight for fair representation all across the country. For more information on active reform campaigns, contact the following state leaders:

State Reform Efforts

Florida*: Common Cause supported a successful ballot initiative in 2010 to amend the Florida Constitution to ban partisan gerrymandering and will now determine how to further reform the system. Contact Liza McClenaghan, Common Cause Florida board chair.

Georgia: Common Cause is working with coalition partners to pass legislation that would reform the process for drawing districts in the state. Contact Sarah Henderson, Common Cause Georgia executive director.

Indiana: After successfully advocating for the creation of a legislative study committee to recommend reforms to the legislature, Common Cause Indiana is working with legislators to create protections against political manipulation of the state’s legislative maps. Contact Julia Vaughn, Common Cause Indiana policy analyst.

Maryland: The Tame the Gerrymander coalition continues to use fun events to shine a spotlight on a serious problem that has resulted in the most gerrymandered congressional district in the country. Contact Jennifer Bevan-Dangel, Common Cause Maryland executive director.

Michigan*: Democracy leaders are determining the best path forward to reform a state with some of the most gerrymandered districts in America.

Nebraska*: Common Cause Nebraska worked with allies in the legislature to pass by a bipartisan majority legislation that would have made the state’s process for drawing legislative districts more transparent and less partisan. Despite a gubernatorial veto, the coalition continues to press for reform. Contact Gavin Geis, Common Cause Nebraska executive director.

North Carolina: Common Cause North Carolina is a member of the End Gerrymandering Now coalition, a strong right-left coalition of unlikely allies who believe that political gerrymandering should play no role in redistricting. Contact Jane Pinsky, director of the North Carolina Coalition for Lobbying and Government Reform.

Ohio*: Building on the momentum of state legislative redistricting reform Ohioans passed in 2015 with strong bipartisan voter support, Common Cause Ohio is now working on congressional redistricting reform. Contact Catherine Turcer, Common Cause Ohio policy analyst.

Pennsylvania: A bipartisan and bicameral group of legislators announced the formation of a working group seeking to draft and pass comprehensive redistricting legislation.

*An asterisk indicates that a state has a direct democracy ballot initiative option.

Latest Status





The Supreme Court agreed this morning to take a new look at partisan gerrymandering, accepting a Wisconsin case in which a three-judge lower court ruled that Republican legislators unfairly drew State Assembly districts that work...

High Court to Consider Partisan Gerrymandering
June 19, 2017

Democracy Wire

Take Action

The Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

Tell Congress to fix the court’s bad decision!

Take action.

Donate

Give Today