{"id":19475,"date":"2024-06-11T11:32:54","date_gmt":"2024-06-11T15:32:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?post_type=resource&p=19475"},"modified":"2025-06-12T12:56:12","modified_gmt":"2025-06-12T16:56:12","slug":"thu-lao","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/vi\/resources\/charge\/","title":{"rendered":"B\u00e1o c\u00e1o c\u00e1o bu\u1ed9c: B\u1ea3ng b\u00e1o c\u00e1o ph\u00e2n chia l\u1ea1i khu v\u1ef1c b\u1ea7u c\u1eed c\u1ed9ng \u0111\u1ed3ng"},"template":"","class_list":["post-19475","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource_type-report"],"acf":{"details":{"summary":"The Community Redistricting Report Card reflects on this redistricting cycle, rating each state\u2019s redistricting process based on community feedback. This report is the product of hundreds of on-the- ground interviews and surveys conducted by CHARGE. ","featured_image":"","resource_type":150,"authors":"","related_issues":[103,2066],"related_work":false,"location":46},"sidebar":{"helper_enable_sidebar":false,"helper_media_contact":{"heading":"Media Contact","manually_enter_person":false,"person":"","name":"","role":"","phone":"","email":""},"helper_links_downloads":{"heading":"Links & Downloads","links":null}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"

T\u1ea3i xu\u1ed1ng b\u00e1o c\u00e1o<\/a><\/p>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"

\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

V\u1ec1 CHARGE<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n\r\nCHARGE, the Coalition Hub for Advancing Redistricting & Grassroots Engagement, is a space for groups that organize people in the states and in local communities. CHARGE is composed of organizations that have presence in different states and that deploy different organizing strategies while uniting around the common goal that redistricting must be transformed to allow more voices to participate, be heard, and be represented.\r\n\r\nThis coalition held 30 joint trainings, reaching over 2,200 activists and community leaders in all 50 states through our Redistricting Community College. Individual CHARGE organizations conducted many more spinoff trainings. In addition to introducing participants to redistricting, our trainings provided the know-how, strategies, and tools organizations need to be effective advocates. The trainings introduced participants to the redistricting process in each state, the Voting Rights Act, how to talk about communities, how to work in coalitions, and how to utilize free online mapping resources.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

C\u1ea5u tr\u00fac c\u1ee7a B\u1ea3ng b\u00e1o c\u00e1o ph\u00e2n chia l\u1ea1i khu v\u1ef1c b\u1ea7u c\u1eed c\u1ed9ng \u0111\u1ed3ng<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n\r\nThe Community Redistricting Report Card reflects on this redistricting cycle, rating each state\u2019s redistricting process based on community feedback. This report is the product of hundreds of on-the- ground interviews and surveys conducted by CHARGE. By engaging with organizations, advocates, and organizers from communities in every state, this report represents a holistic view of the redistricting experience\u2014what worked, what did not work, and what can be done differently in the future.\r\n\r\nEach interview and survey asked questions surrounding each state\u2019s redistricting process, including the transparency and accessibility of the process, the role of community groups, the organizing landscape, and the use of communities of interest criteria.\r\n\r\nThis report contains a background on each state\u2019s redistricting scheme, the successes and challenges, and lessons learned to improve future redistricting cycles. The letter grade given to each state reflects the aggregate feedback and grades given by our interviewees\u2014how they viewed their state\u2019s redistricting process.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

Nh\u1eefng th\u00e1ch th\u1ee9c trong vi\u1ec7c ph\u00e2n chia l\u1ea1i khu v\u1ef1c b\u1ea7u c\u1eed v\u00e0 k\u1ebft qu\u1ea3 b\u00e1o c\u00e1o<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n\r\nUnder the best of circumstances, public participation in redistricting can be challenging. In states where legislators draw districts, they jealously guard their power so they can draw districts behind closed doors to maximize partisan advantage and protect themselves from potential challengers. This cycle, legislators often achieved that goal by limiting the number of public redistricting hearings, scheduling them when many potential participants were working, providing limited translation services or disability access, and simply drawing district maps in secret without regard to public input.\r\n\r\nIn addition to those challenges, which are common to every redistricting cycle, participants in the 2020 cycle faced unprecedented barriers to public participation. States received census data six months later than usual due to a pandemic-driven change to the U.S. Census Bureau\u2019s counting schedule. This condensed the time available to organize communities and provide meaningful feedback in response to draft maps. The pandemic also made it difficult at certain critical points in the redistricting cycle to host in-person organizing sessions that are crucial to building power.\r\n\r\nDespite these numerous barriers to participation, organizers found creative ways to conduct public education and engage communities. With the support of CHARGE resources, democracy advocates across the country trained their fellow citizens on the connection between redistricting and effective democratic representation, mapping their communities to give those drawing final maps specific and usable feedback, and giving clear, concise, and compelling testimony at redistricting hearings.\r\n\r\nAlthough efforts to organize communities varied greatly due to local circumstances, some common themes are discernable.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

Nh\u1eefng ph\u00e1t hi\u1ec7n ch\u00ednh<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n