Hướng dẫn

Giải thích: Sắc lệnh hành pháp của Trump về Quyền công dân theo nơi sinh

bởi Dan Vicuna

Sắc lệnh hành pháp của Trump: Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship 

President Trump’s executive order concerning birthright citizenship is an unlawful, ahistorical, and illogical attack on the U.S. Constitution. 

What Does the Fourteenth Amendment Say About Citizenship?

The plain language of the 14th Amendment makes clear that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

During the debate over ratification of the amendment, proponents and opponents of birthright citizenship knew that the right to American citizenship at birth for children born in the United States to non-citizen parents was at stake in the amendment’s final language. Members of Congress understood that the “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause only eliminated from birthright citizenship two categories of people who are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States: the children of diplomats, who enjoy diplomatic immunity, and lawful enemy combatants, who enjoy enemy combatant immunity. Congressional debate featured arguments about whether the children of Chinese and “gypsy” immigrants who were neither diplomats nor lawful enemy combatants should be granted birthright citizenship because it was well understood that the final language of the amendment would grant that right. 

United States v. Wong Kim Ark: Upholding Birthright Citizenship

The Supreme Court of the United States affirmed the clear and unambiguous meaning of the 14th Amendment in 1898 and has not reversed itself in the intervening 127 years. In United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the American-born child of Chinese immigrant parents was denied re-entry into the United States by the collector of customs in the Port of San Francisco following a trip to China on the basis of the Chinese Exclusion Act and the mistaken belief that he was not an American citizen. Wong Kim Ark appealed this decision, arguing that his birth in San Francisco in 1873 granted him American citizenship under the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court agreed with Wong’s argument, holding that the amendment granted citizenship to any person born in the United States who was not the child of a foreign diplomat at the time of their birth.  

“Defining ‘American’” by James C. Ho provided much of the history of the 14th Amendment debate in this article. 

Hướng dẫn

Giải thích: Chính quyền Trump bất chấp lệnh của Tòa án về việc dừng trục xuất

Chính quyền Trump biện minh cho việc trục xuất hàng trăm người nhập cư bằng cách viện dẫn Đạo luật Kẻ thù ngoài hành tinh năm 1798 (sau đây gọi tắt là "Đạo luật"), bất chấp lệnh của tòa án liên bang tạm thời cấm trục xuất và yêu cầu các chuyến bay trục xuất phải quay trở lại Hoa Kỳ.

Bởi: Alton Wang

Hướng dẫn

Giải thích: Sắc lệnh hành pháp của Trump về Quyền công dân theo nơi sinh

bởi Dan Vicuna

Đóng

Đóng

Xin chào! Có vẻ như bạn đang tham gia cùng chúng tôi từ {state}.

Bạn có muốn biết chuyện gì đang xảy ra ở tiểu bang của bạn không?

Đi đến Nguyên nhân chung {state}