{"id":13477,"date":"2014-11-12T22:54:00","date_gmt":"2014-11-12T22:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/"},"modified":"2014-11-12T22:54:00","modified_gmt":"2014-11-12T22:54:00","slug":"supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case"},"template":"","class_list":["post-13477","article","type-article","status-publish","hentry","article_type-blog-post"],"acf":{"details":{"summary":"The Supreme Court is considering whether Alabama grouped African-American voters into a few districts to enhance Republican prospects in other, mostly white districts.","featured_image":null,"article_type":1103,"authors":["{\"site_id\":\"1\",\"post_type\":\"person\",\"post_id\":7854}"],"related_issues":[103,169,2066],"related_work":false,"location":null},"sidebar":{"helper_enable_sidebar":false,"helper_media_contact":{"heading":"Media Contact","manually_enter_person":false,"person":null,"name":"","role":"","phone":"","email":""},"helper_links_downloads":{"heading":"Links & Downloads","links":null}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<p><p>The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday in a case challenging Alabama&rsquo;s state legislative districts as an illegal racial gerrymander. The plan&rsquo;s challengers, including the Alabama Legislative Black Caucus and the Alabama Democratic Conference, claim that the legislature intentionally packed black voters into fewer districts to make adjoining districts safer for Republican candidates. A similar case in which a three-judge federal district court panel&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/local\/virginia-politics\/court-throws-out-virginia-congressional-map\/2014\/10\/07\/97fb866a-4e56-11e4-8c24-487e92bc997b_story.html\" target=\"_blank\">overturned Virginia&rsquo;s congressional map<\/a>&nbsp;as an unlawful racial gerrymander could be impacted.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>After the 2010 census, Alabama&rsquo;s redistricting plan&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/2014\/11\/12\/363375057\/supreme-court-case-seeks-source-of-alabama-gerrymandering\" target=\"_blank\">moved about one-sixth of all eligible black voters<\/a>&nbsp;from majority-white State Senate districts to majority-black districts. In one majority-black State Senate District, the legislature&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/2014\/11\/12\/363375057\/supreme-court-case-seeks-source-of-alabama-gerrymandering\" target=\"_blank\">removed white residents who had lived in the district for years and added 16,000 new residents<\/a>. Only 36 of the 16,000 new residents were not black. The new district became 75 percent black while the percentage of white voters in an adjacent district rose substantially.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/2014\/10\/argument-preview-racial-gerrymandering-partisan-politics-and-the-future-of-the-voting-rights-act\/\" target=\"_blank\">Alabama claims<\/a>&nbsp;that the Voting Rights Act&rsquo;s prohibition against weakening minority voting power and the state&rsquo;s goal of limiting population deviations between districts to less than two percentage points required it to maintain at least the same percentage of black voters in each majority-minority district and allowed it to do so by moving black voters into underpopulated districts. A judge dissenting on the lower court&rsquo;s decision to uphold the districts referred to Alabama&rsquo;s&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/briefs-v2\/12-96_pet_amcu_soa.authcheckdam.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">support for gutting Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. Holder<\/a>&nbsp;while simultaneously claiming that the law allowed them to pack black voters as a&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/2014\/10\/argument-preview-racial-gerrymandering-partisan-politics-and-the-future-of-the-voting-rights-act\/\" target=\"_blank\">&ldquo;cruel irony.&rdquo;<\/a><\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>During&nbsp;Wednesday&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/courts_law\/alabama-minority-redistricting-case-seems-to-divide-supreme-court\/2014\/11\/12\/217484be-6a8b-11e4-9fb4-a622dae742a2_story.html\" target=\"_blank\">s oral arguments<\/a>, Justice Elena Kagan declared that Alabama had a &ldquo;mistaken understanding&rdquo; of Voting Rights Act requirements when it claimed it was required to maintain at least the same percentage of black voters in each majority-minority district. She added that <a href=\"http:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/news\/court-weighs-role-race-redistricting\" target=\"_blank\">&ldquo;the numbers speak for themselves&rdquo;<\/a>&nbsp;when observing that Alabama clearly used race as the primary deciding factor in drawing districts.<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>The following parties submitted amicus briefs in this case in support of those challenging the maps:<\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/BriefsV4\/13-1138_appell_amcu_adl.authcheckdam.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Anti-Defamation League<\/a><\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/sblog.s3.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/13-895-13-1138-tsac-The-Brennan-Center-for-Justice-at-NYU.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Brennan Center<\/a><\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/BriefsV4\/13-895-13-1138_appel_amcu_naacpldef.authcheckdam.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">NAACP LDF<\/a><\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/news\/court-weighs-role-race-redistricting\" target=\"_blank\">North Carolina litigants represented by Southern Coalition for Social Justice<\/a><\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>The following parties submitted amicus briefs in support of the legislature:<\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/BriefsV4\/13-895-13-1138_appellee_amcu_soahr-etal.authcheckdam.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Speaker of the Alabama House of Representatives and President Pro Tempore of the Alabama Senate<\/a><\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/BriefsV4\/13-895-13-1138_appellee_amcu_soahr-etal.authcheckdam.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Pacific Legal Foundation<\/a><\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/BriefsV4\/13-895-13-1138_appelle_amcu_djo.authcheckdam.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Dalton L. Oldham<\/a><\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p>The following parties submitted an amicus brief in support of neither party:<\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/sblog.s3.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/13-895tsacUnitedStates.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Estados Unidos<\/a><\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/BriefsV4\/13-895_np_lccr.authcheckdam.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Lawyers&rsquo; Committee for Civil Rights Under Law<\/a><\/p><p>&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/BriefsV4\/13-1138_np_amcu_profs-rkg-etal.authcheckdam.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Political science, government, and statistics professors<\/a><\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/p>"}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case - Common Cause<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/mga-artikulo-2\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/mga-artikulo-2\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Common Cause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CommonCause\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case - Common Cause\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-12T22:54:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tl\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tl\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tl\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"width\":2066,\"height\":331,\"caption\":\"Common Cause\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case - Common Cause","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/mga-artikulo-2\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case","og_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/mga-artikulo-2\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/","og_site_name":"Common Cause","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@CommonCause","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/","name":"Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case - Common Cause","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-11-12T22:54:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tl","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/articles\/supreme-court-takes-on-redistricting-in-alabama-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Takes on Redistricting In Alabama Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","name":"Karaniwang Dahilan","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tl"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization","name":"Karaniwang Dahilan","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tl","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","width":2066,"height":331,"caption":"Common Cause"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/"]}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Common Cause","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/13477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/13477\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}