{"id":357,"date":"2023-06-28T17:02:15","date_gmt":"2023-06-28T17:02:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/"},"modified":"2023-06-28T17:02:15","modified_gmt":"2023-06-28T17:02:15","slug":"why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/articles\/de-ce-conteaza-in-ohio-curtea-suprema-a-sua-respinge-teoria-legislativului-statului-independent\/","title":{"rendered":"De ce conteaz\u0103 \u00een Ohio \u2013 Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA respinge teoria legislativului statului independent"},"template":"","class_list":["post-357","article","type-article","status-publish","hentry","article_type-blog-post"],"acf":{"details":{"summary":"","featured_image":null,"article_type":153,"authors":null,"related_issues":[62,420],"related_work":[112],"location":null},"sidebar":{"helper_enable_sidebar":false,"helper_media_contact":{"heading":"Media Contact","manually_enter_person":false,"person":null,"name":"","role":"","phone":"","email":""},"helper_links_downloads":{"heading":"Links & Downloads","links":null}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mar\u021bi, 28 iunie, Curtea Suprem\u0103 a Statelor Unite \u0219i-a anun\u021bat hot\u0103r\u00e2rea <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/22pdf\/21-857_4357.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moore v. Harper<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">cazul redistribuirii districtului Carolina de Nord. Curtea <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(\u0219ase p\u00e2n\u0103 la trei<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) a respins teoria conform c\u0103reia instan\u021ba de stat nu avea dreptul s\u0103 stopeze gerrymandering.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Doi legiuitori ai statului Carolina de Nord au sus\u021binut c\u0103 Curtea Suprem\u0103 din Carolina de Nord nu are dreptul de a interveni \u00een realizarea h\u0103r\u021bilor lor. Argumentul lor juridic s-a bazat pe o no\u021biune marginal\u0103 \u2013 a\u0219a-numita<\/span> <b>Teoria legislativului statului independent<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Cei care sus\u021bin aceast\u0103 teorie sus\u021bin c\u0103 Clauza privind alegerile din Constitu\u021bia SUA ofer\u0103 legislatorilor statelor autoritate unic\u0103 asupra alegerilor federale din statul lor \u0219i interzice instan\u021belor s\u0103 se amestece \u00een deciziile lor.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA a respins teoria legislativului independent al statelor \u0219i a stabilit c\u0103 clauza electoral\u0103 din Constitu\u021bia SUA \u201e<\/b><b><i>nu izoleaz\u0103 legislativele statelor de exercitarea obi\u0219nuit\u0103 a controlului judiciar statal.\u201d<\/i><\/b>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Curtea a confirmat autoritatea Cur\u021bii Supreme din Carolina de Nord de a se pronun\u021ba asupra constitu\u021bionalit\u0103\u021bii h\u0103r\u021bii congresului statului. SCOTUS \u0219i-a rezervat un rol \u00een asigurarea supravegherii pentru a se asigura c\u0103 instan\u021bele de stat nu \u201edep\u0103\u0219esc limitele obi\u0219nuite ale controlului judiciar\u201d.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Acesta este un mare c\u00e2\u0219tig pentru democra\u021bie! Instan\u021bele de stat au autoritatea de a interveni \u00een chestiunile privind alegerile federale, inclusiv aplicarea protec\u021biilor constitu\u021bionale ale statului.\u00a0<\/b>\r\n\r\n<i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eAceasta este o victorie istoric\u0103 pentru oamenii din Carolina de Nord \u0219i pentru democra\u021bia american\u0103. Ast\u0103zi, Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA a precizat c\u0103 instan\u021bele de stat \u0219i constitu\u021biile statului ar trebui s\u0103 serveasc\u0103 drept un control critic \u00eempotriva abuzurilor de putere ale legiuitorilor.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a spus Bob Phillips, directorul executiv al Common Cause North Carolina.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Ce \u00eenseamn\u0103 asta pentru Ohio?<\/b>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Constitu\u021bia Ohio include interdic\u021bii privind gerrymandering. Interdic\u021biile privind administrarea districtelor congresului au fost aprobate \u00een mare parte de aleg\u0103torii din Ohio \u00een 2018. Anul trecut, Curtea Suprem\u0103 din Ohio a stabilit de dou\u0103 ori c\u0103 h\u0103r\u021bile Congresului erau neconstitu\u021bionale.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen loc s\u0103 redeseneze districtele Congresului \u0219i s\u0103 respecte ordinul din iulie 2021, liderii legislativi s-au referit \u00een schimb la Teoria Legisla\u021biei Statului Independent \u0219i au f\u0103cut apel la Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA, argument\u00e2nd c\u0103 Curtea Suprem\u0103 din Ohio a dep\u0103\u0219it \u0219i nu avea autoritatea s\u0103 spun\u0103 legislativului statului ce anume. a face.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een timp ce <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Huffman v. Nieman<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> nu a fost demis, cel de ieri <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea probabil va determina Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA s\u0103 resping\u0103 acest recurs \u0219i va trebui creat\u0103 o nou\u0103 hart\u0103 a Congresului pentru alegerile din 2024.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mai important, cel <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moore v. Harper <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">decizia \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 putem merge \u00een urm\u0103torul nostru efort de reform\u0103, \u00eenfiin\u021barea unei comisii independente pentru cet\u0103\u021beni, cu claritatea c\u0103 reformele din Constitu\u021bia Ohio nu vor fi ocolite, deoarece nu exist\u0103 control judiciar sau control asupra puterii legislative de stat.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Pre\u0219edintele John Roberts a scris decizia. Lui i s-au al\u0103turat Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan \u0219i Sonia Sotomayor. Judec\u0103torii Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch \u0219i Samuel Alito au fost disidente.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Pentru discu\u021bii suplimentare despre <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moore v. Harper<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> decizie, a se vedea urm\u0103toarele articole:<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cleveland.com\/news\/2023\/06\/in-blow-to-ohio-republicans-us-supreme-court-rejects-state-legislators-arguments-in-north-carolina-redistricting-case.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA a respins argumentele legislatorilor statali \u00een cazul de redistribuire a circumscrip\u021biilor electorale din Carolina de Nord, o lovitur\u0103 dat\u0103 republicanilor din Ohio - cleveland.com<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/north-carolina\/democracy-wire\/victory-us-supreme-court-stops-power-grab-by-nc-politicians-in-historic-moore-v-harper-ruling\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VICTORIE! Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA opre\u0219te acapararea puterii de c\u0103tre politicienii din Carolina de Nord \u00een decizia istoric\u0103 Moore vs. Harper - Common Cause North Carolina<\/span><\/a>\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/news\/daily-comment\/the-supreme-court-declines-to-dismantle-democracy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Curtea Suprem\u0103 refuz\u0103 s\u0103 demonteze democra\u021bia | New Yorkerul<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Dori\u021bi s\u0103 v\u0103 al\u0103tura\u021bi listei noastre de e-mailuri Fair Districts? \u00censcrie\u021bi-v\u0103 <a href=\"https:\/\/actionnetwork.org\/forms\/join-fair-districts-ohio\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AICI<\/a>.<\/p>"}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Why It Matters in Ohio &#8211; US Supreme Court Rejects Independent State Legislature Theory - Common Cause Ohio<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/articles\/de-ce-conteaza-in-ohio-curtea-suprema-a-sua-respinge-teoria-legislativului-statului-independent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why It Matters in Ohio &#8211; US Supreme Court Rejects Independent State Legislature Theory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/articles\/de-ce-conteaza-in-ohio-curtea-suprema-a-sua-respinge-teoria-legislativului-statului-independent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Common Cause Ohio\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/OH.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/\",\"name\":\"Why It Matters in Ohio &#8211; US Supreme Court Rejects Independent State Legislature Theory - Common Cause Ohio\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-28T17:02:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why It Matters in Ohio &#8211; US Supreme Court Rejects Independent State Legislature Theory\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/\",\"name\":\"Common Cause Ohio\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"De ce conteaz\u0103 \u00een Ohio \u2013 Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA respinge teoria legislativului statului independent - Cauz\u0103 comun\u0103 Ohio","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/articles\/de-ce-conteaza-in-ohio-curtea-suprema-a-sua-respinge-teoria-legislativului-statului-independent\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why It Matters in Ohio &#8211; US Supreme Court Rejects Independent State Legislature Theory","og_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/articles\/de-ce-conteaza-in-ohio-curtea-suprema-a-sua-respinge-teoria-legislativului-statului-independent\/","og_site_name":"Common Cause Ohio","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/OH.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/","name":"De ce conteaz\u0103 \u00een Ohio \u2013 Curtea Suprem\u0103 a SUA respinge teoria legislativului statului independent - Cauz\u0103 comun\u0103 Ohio","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-06-28T17:02:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/articles\/why-it-matters-in-ohio-us-supreme-court-rejects-independent-state-legislature-theory\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why It Matters in Ohio &#8211; US Supreme Court Rejects Independent State Legislature Theory"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/","name":"Cauz\u0103 comun\u0103 Ohio","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Common Cause Ohio","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/357\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/ohio\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}