{"id":14106,"date":"2019-10-17T16:44:21","date_gmt":"2019-10-17T20:44:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/"},"modified":"2024-07-10T15:58:17","modified_gmt":"2024-07-10T19:58:17","slug":"representation-de-blanchiment","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/","title":{"rendered":"Repr\u00e9sentation blanchissante"},"template":"","class_list":["post-14106","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource_type-report"],"acf":{"details":{"summary":"Partisan operatives are trying to change how electoral districts are drawn, in a radical effort to undermine our representative democracy.","featured_image":"","resource_type":150,"authors":"","related_issues":[138,2066,103],"related_work":[188],"location":46},"sidebar":{"helper_enable_sidebar":false,"helper_media_contact":{"heading":"Media Contact","manually_enter_person":false,"person":"","name":"","role":"","phone":"","email":""},"helper_links_downloads":{"heading":"Links & Downloads","links":null}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"Partisan operatives are trying to change how electoral districts are drawn, in a radical effort to undermine our representative democracy. By law, electoral districts must have about the same number of people, and state leaders draw those boundaries based on total population counts. But a group of party leaders at the national and state level have been plotting to draw state legislative and congressional districts based solely on the citizen voting-age population (CVAP)\u2014a move that they believe would be advantageous to white voters and harm areas where more people of color, legal residents, immigrants and children live.\r\n\r\nThese secret efforts manifested in the Trump Administration\u2019s quest to whitewash our representation by demanding that the 2020 Census include a citizenship question. He abandoned that effort after a U.S. Supreme Court loss and instead issued an executive order demanding several federal agencies provide all their information \u2013 that is, administrative data \u2013 on citizenship status to the Census Bureau. He ordered the Bureau to combine this administrative data with data from the decennial census and the American Community Survey (ACS) in order to identify non-citizens residing in the United States. The Census Bureau plans to send the aggregate data to states for redistricting.\r\n\r\nIn recently revealed documents, Dr. Thomas Hofeller, the Republican gerrymandering strategist behind many of the most controversial gerrymandered maps, analyzed and concluded that basing redistricting on citizens aged 18 and over, would \u201cbe advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic Whites.\u201d He recognized that this move away from using a count of the total U.S. population would be a \u201cradical departure from the federal \u2018one person, one vote\u2019 rule\u201d that underlies our representative democracy.\r\n\r\nHofeller stated creating this racial and partisan advantage by removing millions of American residents could only be achieved by collecting citizenship data at the census block level. (More information on the Hofeller Files found <a href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/resource\/the-hofeller-files\/\">ici<\/a>.)\r\n\r\nUsing citizen voting age data to draw districts will exclude millions of young people and people of color, violates the Constitution and undermines the principles of equal representation that our country strives towards. Understanding the intricacies of what administrative data is, how it is used and what challenges can arise from its use in the 2020 Census gives advocates the tools to fight back."}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>Les points \u00e0 retenir du rapport sont les suivants :<\/h3>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Les donn\u00e9es administratives sur la citoyennet\u00e9 ne doivent pas \u00eatre fusionn\u00e9es avec les donn\u00e9es du recensement de 2020 dans les fichiers de red\u00e9coupage qui sont envoy\u00e9s aux \u00c9tats, car les donn\u00e9es seront utilis\u00e9es par des agents partisans pour justifier la distorsion des circonscriptions \u00e9lectorales d\u2019une mani\u00e8re qui, selon les termes de Thomas Hofeller, est \u00ab avantageuse pour les r\u00e9publicains et les blancs non hispaniques \u00bb.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>L\u2019int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es du recensement de 2020 et de l\u2019American Community Survey ne doit pas \u00eatre entach\u00e9e par des donn\u00e9es administratives inexactes et peu fiables sur l\u2019\u00e9volution du statut d\u2019immigration des personnes. Les donn\u00e9es administratives sur la citoyennet\u00e9 aggraveront le sous-d\u00e9nombrement des enfants et des personnes de couleur.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Il existe d\u2019importantes protections juridiques qui interdisent le partage et l\u2019utilisation des donn\u00e9es du recensement pour cibler des individus, mais il existe des risques dont les d\u00e9fenseurs doivent \u00eatre conscients et vigilants.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\nVous avez une question \u00e0 laquelle vous ne trouvez pas de r\u00e9ponse ici ? Envoyez un e-mail \u00e0 Keshia Morris \u00e0 <a href=\"mailto:kmorris@commoncause.org\">kmorris@commoncause.org<\/a> ou Suzanne Almeida \u00e0<a href=\"mailto:salmeida@commoncause.org\"> salmeida@commoncause.org.<\/a>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h2>Donn\u00e9es de recensement 101<\/h2>\r\n<h3>Qu\u2019est-ce que le recensement et quelles donn\u00e9es collecte-t-il ?<\/h3>\r\nLe recensement d\u00e9cennal, effectu\u00e9 tous les 10 ans comme l&#039;exige la <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/history\/pdf\/Article_1_Section_2.pdf\">Constitution des \u00c9tats-Unis<\/a>, est un d\u00e9compte total de toutes les personnes vivant aux \u00c9tats-Unis dans leur \u00ab r\u00e9sidence habituelle \u00bb au moment du recensement. Les donn\u00e9es du recensement sont principalement collect\u00e9es au moyen d&#039;un questionnaire abr\u00e9g\u00e9 envoy\u00e9 \u00e0 chaque r\u00e9sidence aux \u00c9tats-Unis. Le formulaire demande le nombre de personnes qui vivent \u00e0 chaque endroit, la race et l&#039;origine ethnique de ces personnes et d&#039;autres donn\u00e9es tr\u00e8s \u00e9l\u00e9mentaires. Les donn\u00e9es agr\u00e9g\u00e9es collect\u00e9es par le recensement sont utilis\u00e9es \u00e0 de nombreuses fins dans les communaut\u00e9s commerciales, philanthropiques et \u00e0 but non lucratif, mais leur objectif principal est de r\u00e9partir la repr\u00e9sentation des \u00c9tats au Congr\u00e8s, d&#039;ex\u00e9cuter le red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions des \u00c9tats et de distribuer des milliards de dollars f\u00e9d\u00e9raux."}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>Plus d&#039;informations sur le recensement d\u00e9cennal<\/h3>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<a class=\"button1\" role=\"button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/history\/www\/programs\/demographic\/decennial_census.html\">Apprendre encore plus<\/a>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>Que sont les \u00eelots de recensement, les groupes d\u2019\u00eelots et les secteurs de recensement?<\/h3>\r\nLe Bureau du recensement d\u00e9finit trois niveaux g\u00e9ographiques. Le plus petit niveau, un <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/newsroom\/blogs\/random-samplings\/2011\/07\/what-are-census-blocks.html\">\u00eelot de recensement<\/a>, is a small geographical area bordered by visible features (such as roads, streets, streams and railroad tracks) and invisible features (such as property lines and boundaries for city, township, school district and county). In cities, census blocks can be thought of as a small city block, with streets binding it on all sides. In suburban areas, census blocks can look more irregular and spread out in area, and are bounded by streams, roads and other geographical limits. In more remote areas, census blocks can be a collection of hundreds of square miles of land. An article within a newspaper serves as a helpful analogy to imagine census blocks. Going from a small to wide frame, a newspaper has single articles, sections for different subjects and the entire newspaper itself. A census block is more like a single article, a collection of words bound to that article itself, and its size ranges from large to small. Census blocks are not delineated by their population size. Many census blocks do not have anyone living in them at all, but they generally range from a population of zero to several hundred people per census block. There are about 8.2 million total census blocks in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.\r\n\r\nThe next largest geography level involves <strong>groupes de blocs<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/11\/13\/2018-24570\/block-groups-for-the-2020-census-final-criteria\">d\u00e9fini dans le Federal Register<\/a> as \u201cstatistical geographic subdivisions of a census tract defined for the tabulation and presentation of data from the decennial census and selected other statistical programs.\u201d Block groups typically contain 600 to 3,000 people, or at least 240 housing units at minimum. Or they contain 1,200 housing units at maximum and are a collection of census blocks. Census block groups may not cross county or state lines, or their geographical equivalent. Block groups are analogous to the sections of a newspaper, which are a collection of articles confined to an area of the newspaper and based on specific subjects. These sections also vary in size, similar to how census blocks vary in size. The United States, including Puerto Rico, has 211,267 block groups.\r\n\r\nThe largest census geography level is known as a census tract. Tracts are county subdivisions, but they can cross city and town lines. These generally contain 1,000 to 8,000 people and are a collection of block groups. Census tracts are analogous to the newspaper itself. Newspapers vary in length, but they all have articles and sections nested within them.<img class=\"wp-image-4030 size-full alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Census-Small-Area-Geography.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"815\" height=\"333\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h3>Plus d&#039;informations sur les zones g\u00e9ographiques du recensement<\/h3>\r\n<a class=\"button1\" role=\"button\" href=\"https:\/\/pitt.libguides.com\/uscensus\/understandinggeography\">Apprendre encore plus<\/a>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>Qu&#039;advient-il des donn\u00e9es du recensement une fois que le Bureau du recensement les re\u00e7oit ?<\/h3>\r\nUne fois qu&#039;un m\u00e9nage remplit son formulaire de recensement, que ce soit en ligne, sur papier ou par t\u00e9l\u00e9phone, le Bureau du recensement crypte les donn\u00e9es et <strong>supprime toutes les informations personnelles identifiables<\/strong>.\r\n\r\nIt is then aggregated and run through additional privacy protection algorithms. By the end of the year in which the census is taken, the aggregate data must be sent to the president (for apportionment). By the following April, the aggregate data must be sent to the states (for redistricting).\r\n\r\nCensus data gathered during the census is used to determine which states gain or lose seats in the House (apportionment), votes in the Electoral College and to redraw congressional, legislative and local districts (redistricting). Census data is also used to allocate hundreds of billions of dollars in federal funding for services, such as health care, education and affordable housing. Businesses rely heavily on the data to make decisions about where to open stores based on population and demographics.\r\n<h3>Comment s&#039;effectue la r\u00e9partition ?<\/h3>\r\nApportionment \u2014 or the dividing of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives among the states, based on total population \u2014 is the primary purpose of the decennial census. The Census Bureau determines the final apportionment and delivers it to the president through the secretary of commerce. The president provides the final apportionment to Congress by December (and in the case of the 2020 Census, by December 31, 2020).\r\n\r\nTo create the final apportionment result, the Census Bureau receives, verifies and tallies the data to create a final resident population file. This file is combined with the count of feder\u00adally affiliated overseas residents (i.e., people who are stationed as military or independent contractors for the federal government). Apportionment calculation formulas are applied to these data and then validated to create the final apportionment results. These results are then independently verified and validated and then used to create the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/population\/apportionment\/data\/2010_apportionment_results.html\">Tableaux de r\u00e9partition d\u00e9finitifs<\/a>, qui pr\u00e9sente la population par \u00c9tat, le nombre correspondant de si\u00e8ges \u00e0 la Chambre des repr\u00e9sentants des \u00c9tats-Unis et l&#039;\u00e9volution depuis le recensement pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent.\r\n<h3>Comment les \u00c9tats utilisent-ils les donn\u00e9es du recensement pour le red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions ?<\/h3>\r\nAfter each census, states use the aggregate popula\u00adtion data to draw legisla\u00adtive and congressional vot\u00ading districts with relatively equal populations. Federal law contains different equal population requirements for congressional districts and state legislative districts, but the equal population requirements in both cases are driven by what the U.S. Supreme Court has dubbed the \u201cone person, one vote\u201d principle.\r\n\r\n\u201cThe history of the Constitution, particularly that part of it relating to the adoption of Art. I, \u00a7 2, reveals that those who framed the Constitution meant that, no matter what the mechanics of an election, whether statewide or by districts, it was population which was to be the basis of the House of Representatives.\u201d \u2013Supreme Court in Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U. S. 9 (1964)\r\n\r\nAccording to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) states can determine what data they use for redistricting. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/research\/redistricting\/redistricting-and-use-of-census-data.aspx\">Vingt et un \u00c9tats<\/a> Les \u00c9tats ont des dispositions l\u00e9gales explicites qui obligent les l\u00e9gislatures des \u00c9tats \u00e0 utiliser uniquement les donn\u00e9es du recensement d\u00e9cennal pour \u00e9tablir les circonscriptions. Dix-sept \u00c9tats ont une d\u00e9pendance \u00ab implicite dans la pratique \u00bb aux donn\u00e9es du recensement. Six \u00c9tats autorisent l\u2019utilisation du recensement ou d\u2019autres donn\u00e9es pour le red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions, et six \u00c9tats ont des r\u00e8gles uniques concernant le d\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions.\r\n<h3>Quelles donn\u00e9es la loi f\u00e9d\u00e9rale exige-t-elle de partager avec les \u00c9tats pour le red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions ?<\/h3>\r\nSous <a href=\"https:\/\/uscode.house.gov\/statutes\/pl\/94\/171.pdf\">Loi publique 94-171<\/a>, the federal government must transmit population tabulation data obtained in the decennial census to each state for use in state legislative redistricting. Pop&shy;ulation tabulations are summary tables with the racial, social and economic characteristics of the people who live in a geographic area. The levels of geography that Public Law 94-171 tabulations summarize range from census-defined geographies (e.g., census blocks, block groups and census tracts) to political geographies that states request (e.g., election precincts, wards, and state house and Senate districts).1\r\n\r\nThe law requires the Census Bureau to provide population data only down to the census block level, but since the start of the Census Redistricting Data Program for the 1980 Census, the Census Bureau has included summaries on larger racial groups,2 cross-tabulated by Hispanic\/ non-Hispanic origin and age (18 years old and over).3 The &lt;strong&gt;Loi publique 94-171 de 2010&lt;\/strong&gt; Les donn&eacute;es r&eacute;capitulatives comprennent &eacute;galement des informations sur le statut d&amp;#039;occupation du logement, par exemple si un logement est vacant et si quelqu&amp;#039;un loue ou poss&egrave;de le logement. Ces r&eacute;sum&eacute;s sont calcul&eacute;s au niveau du bloc de recensement lorsque cela est possible, mais sont &eacute;galement calcul&eacute;s, &agrave; la demande des l&eacute;gislatures des &Eacute;tats, pour les circonscriptions &eacute;lectorales, les quartiers et les districts de la Chambre des repr&eacute;sentants et du S&eacute;nat de l&amp;#039;&Eacute;tat."}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_image","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_image":{"image":4029,"width":"medium"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"Le d\u00e9cret du pr\u00e9sident Trump exige que les donn\u00e9es sur la citoyennet\u00e9 soient \u00e9galement envoy\u00e9es aux \u00c9tats dans le cadre du fichier de red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions \u00e9lectorales. Ces donn\u00e9es seront disponibles jusqu&#039;au niveau du bloc de recensement, mais les \u00c9tats peuvent \u00e9galement demander les donn\u00e9es pour d&#039;autres zones g\u00e9ographiques.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">(Trouvez plus d&#039;informations sur ce qui est inclus dans le <\/span><a style=\"font-size: 16px;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/data\/datasets\/2010\/dec\/redistricting-file-pl-94-171.html\">fichier de donn\u00e9es de red\u00e9coupage<\/a><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\"> et plus d&#039;informations sur <\/span><a style=\"font-size: 16px;\" href=\"https:\/\/uscode.house.gov\/statutes\/pl\/94\/171.pdf\">Loi publique 94-171<\/a><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">.)<\/span>\r\n<h3>Comment les donn\u00e9es de citoyennet\u00e9 sont-elles utilis\u00e9es dans le red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions pour faire respecter la loi sur le droit de vote ?<\/h3>\r\nIn most states, citizenship data is not used in drawing maps, but is used to evaluate districts under the Voting Rights Act (VRA) by establishing the citizen voting age population (CVAP). CVAP is the number of people living in a specific area, such as a census block or congressional district, who are citizens aged 18 or older. That data is currently obtained from the American Community Survey (ACS).\r\n\r\nHistorically, CVAP data from the ACS has been used to determine the size and location of mi\u00adnority populations to ensure compliance with the VRA. Section 2 of the VRA prohibits states and political subdivisions from employing voting practices, standards and procedures that discriminate against any United States citizen on the basis of race, color or religion. Such dis\u00adcrimination includes the drawing of district lines in a manner that dilutes the political power of minority populations.\r\n\r\nTo establish that a districting plan violates Section 2, the minority group must demonstrate that the plan lacks one or more districts in which the minority group can elect its candidate of choice, despite the fact (1) that \u201cit is sufficiently large and geographically compact to con\u00adstitute a majority in a single-member district\u201d; (2) that it is \u201cpolitically cohesive\u201d; and (3) that \u201cthe white majority votes sufficiently as a bloc to enable it ... usually to defeat the minority\u2019s preferred candidate\u201d.4\r\n<h3>Comment d\u00e9terminons-nous la population citoyenne en \u00e2ge de voter ?<\/h3>\r\nActuellement, la population en \u00e2ge de voter (\u00e9galement appel\u00e9e \u00ab population \u00e9ligible au vote \u00bb) provient de l\u2019American Community Survey (ACS). L\u2019ACS est men\u00e9e par le Bureau du recensement et utilise un \u00e9chantillonnage pour solliciter des r\u00e9ponses de m\u00e9nages s\u00e9lectionn\u00e9s au hasard chaque ann\u00e9e. Apr\u00e8s le recensement de 2000, l\u2019ACS a remplac\u00e9 des \u00e9l\u00e9ments du formulaire long du recensement <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/history\/www\/through_the_decades\/questionnaires\/\">questionnaire<\/a> with a questionnaire that goes to a smaller sampling of households on an annual basis. The ACS asks respondents about themselves and their communities, including questions about their jobs and occupations, educational attainment, veteran status and rent or home ownership status. Since its conception, the ACS has inquired about citizenship, and race by Hispanic\/ non-Hispanic origin.\r\n\r\n(Find more information on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/programs-surveys\/acs\">Enqu\u00eate sur la communaut\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaine<\/a>.)"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h2>Donn\u00e9es administratives 101<\/h2>\r\n<h3><strong>Qu&#039;est-ce qu&#039;une donn\u00e9e administrative ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nLes donn\u00e9es administratives, \u00e9galement appel\u00e9es \u00ab dossiers administratifs \u00bb, concernent tous les dossiers que les agences collectent et conservent afin d\u2019administrer les programmes qu\u2019elles g\u00e8rent. Le site Web du Bureau du recensement fournit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/about\/what\/admin-data.html\">un aper\u00e7u<\/a> Ce que sont les donn\u00e9es administratives et comment elles sont utilis\u00e9es \u00e0 des fins de recensement. Ces donn\u00e9es comprennent des dossiers des gouvernements f\u00e9d\u00e9ral, \u00e9tatiques et locaux et, parfois, des donn\u00e9es d&#039;entit\u00e9s commerciales.\r\n<h3><strong>Quelle est la diff\u00e9rence entre les donn\u00e9es administratives, les donn\u00e9es d\u2019enqu\u00eate de l\u2019ACS et le recensement de 2020\u00a0? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nAdministrative records are data collected from federal agencies. It includes whatever infor\u00admation that agency collects from people who interact with it. It does not include information from people who have not interacted with the agency.\r\n\r\nIn contrast, the American Community Survey is a questionnaire that the Census Bureau sends to some households to get a picture of the general population. Unlike the official decennial census, the Census Bureau does not send the ACS questionnaire to every household in the United States. Instead, it sends a detailed questionnaire to a sample of households that have been randomly selected to represent a cross-section of the country -- about 1 in 38 house\u00adholds each year. This sample helps us understand the changes taking place across the nation.\r\n\r\nThe decennial census is special because it is a questionnaire that is administered to <strong><em>chaque foyer <\/em><\/strong>aux \u00c9tats-Unis, pas seulement dans certains cas. De plus, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 que le questionnaire du recensement de 2020 (et de tout recensement d\u00e9cennal) est administr\u00e9 dans un <strong><em>sept mois<\/em><\/strong> p\u00e9riode, cela donne un aper\u00e7u tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cis des Am\u00e9ricains au cours de cette p\u00e9riode.\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">EMPORTER:<\/span> <\/strong>Le recensement nous donne un aper\u00e7u de la d\u00e9mographie am\u00e9ricaine<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3>Quelles sources de donn\u00e9es administratives seront utilis\u00e9es pour identifier la citoyennet\u00e9 ?<\/h3>\r\nLe d\u00e9cret du pr\u00e9sident Trump \u00e9num\u00e8re les sources suivantes :\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>D\u00e9partement de la Sant\u00e9 et des Services Sociaux (Centres des services Medicare et Medicaid, syst\u00e8me d&#039;information sur les programmes Medicaid et d&#039;assurance maladie pour enfants) ;<\/li>\r\n \t<li>D\u00e9partement de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 int\u00e9rieure, Services de citoyennet\u00e9 et d\u2019immigration des \u00c9tats-Unis (fichier national des r\u00e9sidents permanents l\u00e9gaux et des naturalisations)\u00a0;<\/li>\r\n \t<li>D\u00e9partement de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 int\u00e9rieure et D\u00e9partement d\u2019\u00c9tat, Syst\u00e8me mondial de traitement des demandes d\u2019asile et de r\u00e9fugi\u00e9s (visas de r\u00e9fugi\u00e9s et d\u2019asile)\u00a0;<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Donn\u00e9es sur les demandes de passeport au niveau national du D\u00e9partement d&#039;\u00c9tat\u00a0;<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Immigration et contr\u00f4le des douanes (visas de non-immigrant F1 et M1) ;<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Arriv\u00e9e\/D\u00e9part des douanes et de la protection des fronti\u00e8res (fichier national de donn\u00e9es sur les transactions) ; et<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Administration de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale (dossiers principaux des b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaires).<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>D\u00e9cret ex\u00e9cutif de juillet 2019<\/h3>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<a class=\"button1\" role=\"button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2019\/07\/16\/2019-15222\/collecting-information-about-citizenship-status-in-connection-with-the-decennial-census\">Apprendre encore plus<\/a>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>Comment les donn\u00e9es administratives sur la citoyennet\u00e9 seront-elles utilis\u00e9es dans le fichier de red\u00e9coupage l\u00e9gislatif de l\u2019\u00c9tat de 2020\u00a0?<\/h3>\r\nThe Executive Order instructs certain federal agencies to send administrative records to the Census Bureau. Data scientists within the Census Bureau will then work to match data across all databases and combine it with American Community Survey data to create a dataset of people who are and are not citizens. Census Bureau staff will process the matched data to remove all personally identifiable information and to comply with additional data privacy and security measures.\r\n\r\nIt is unclear whether this information will then be mixed with the existing 2020 Census data tabulations or whether it will be sent as a separate product to the states.\r\n\r\nIn a <strong>document r\u00e9cent<\/strong>, le Bureau du recensement a confirm\u00e9 que les donn\u00e9es sur la citoyennet\u00e9 seront mises \u00e0 disposition dans les fichiers de red\u00e9coupage de 2020 pour \u00ab l&#039;\u00c9tat, le comt\u00e9, la localit\u00e9, la zone et le bloc de tabulation \u00bb. En outre, si un \u00c9tat a particip\u00e9 au programme de donn\u00e9es de red\u00e9coupage et a travaill\u00e9 \u00e0 synchroniser les limites de ses circonscriptions \u00e9lectorales (commun\u00e9ment appel\u00e9es \u00ab circonscriptions \u00bb) avec les limites des blocs de recensement, cet \u00c9tat peut demander des num\u00e9ros de recensement pour \u00ab ses limites de circonscriptions l\u00e9gislatives, l\u00e9gislatives et \u00e9lectorales \u00bb. Certains \u00c9tats ne participent pas \u00e0 ce programme ; des \u00c9tats comme <a href=\"https:\/\/statewidedatabase.org\/\">Californie<\/a> match the 2020 Census data with their precinct-level voting data through their own state-based programs for redistricting.\r\n\r\nThe Census Bureau will only release 2020 Census data in what is called \u201caggregate\u201d form. That is, the 2020 Census data will NOT include information about any one person and will not include data that could personally identify a person. Aggregate data for people in a census block would give information for groups of 200-600 people in an area.\r\n<blockquote><strong>Le Bureau du recensement ne publiera jamais un rapport disant : \u00ab La famille vivant au 123e \u00e9tage compte des personnes qui ne sont pas citoyens. \u00bb<\/strong><\/blockquote>\r\nQu&#039;est-ce que cela signifie ? Le Bureau du recensement ne publiera jamais un rapport qui dira : \u00ab La famille qui habite au 123 Street compte des personnes qui ne sont pas citoyennes. \u00bb Il dira peut-\u00eatre : \u00ab Dans le bloc de recensement X, o\u00f9 il y a 550 personnes, 489 personnes sont citoyennes. \u00bb\r\n<h3><strong>Comment les donn\u00e9es administratives ont-elles \u00e9t\u00e9 utilis\u00e9es auparavant dans le cadre du recensement ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nAdministrative data has previously been used to aid in counting students and prisoners, to assist in counting people who had not responded to the census (nonresponse follow-up), to update the census Master Address File and to follow up on potentially inaccurate census responses.\r\n\r\nAdministrative data has also played a major role in assisting other Census Bu\u00adreau programs for population, economic, income and poverty, and health insur\u00adance estimates. It has never been used as the sole source of data collection for demographic information in the way that it is proposed to be the primary source of information on citizenship in 2020.\r\n\r\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">EMPORTER:<\/span> Les registres administratifs n\u2019ont jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 utilis\u00e9s comme seule source de collecte de donn\u00e9es pour les informations d\u00e9mographiques<\/strong>\r\n\r\n(Retrouvez plus d&#039;informations sur <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/content\/dam\/Census\/about\/about-the-bureau\/adrm\/data-linkage\/Data%20Acquisitions%20Frequently%20Asked%20Questions.pdf\">Programmes du Bureau du recensement<\/a> \u00e0 l&#039;aide de donn\u00e9es administratives, un historique de ses <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gao.gov\/assets\/690\/686099.pdf\">utiliser dans le recensement d\u00e9cennal<\/a> et comment le Bureau du recensement utilise <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/about\/what\/admin-data.html\">donn\u00e9es administratives<\/a> aux hyperliens.)"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h2>Probl\u00e8mes de donn\u00e9es<\/h2>\r\n<h3><strong>Quels types de probl\u00e8mes de donn\u00e9es peuvent survenir\u00a0? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nIl existe trois types de probl\u00e8mes pouvant survenir lors de l\u2019utilisation de donn\u00e9es administratives.\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Les registres administratifs peuvent constituer une mesure pr\u00e9cise des tendances globales, mais des probl\u00e8mes surviennent lorsqu\u2019ils sont utilis\u00e9s pour faire correspondre et compter des m\u00e9nages sp\u00e9cifiques dans la base de donn\u00e9es du recensement.5<\/li>\r\n \t<li>La comparaison des donn\u00e9es entre les bases de donn\u00e9es aboutit souvent \u00e0 des donn\u00e9es incompl\u00e8tes ou incoh\u00e9rentes en raison d&#039;erreurs administratives, d&#039;erreurs de collecte de donn\u00e9es ou d&#039;autres probl\u00e8mes. Ces probl\u00e8mes sont plus prononc\u00e9s pour les noms non anglicis\u00e9s.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Les donn\u00e9es administratives fournissent des donn\u00e9es uniquement sur les personnes qui apparaissent dans les registres, ce qui est susceptible d\u2019entra\u00eener un sous-d\u00e9nombrement diff\u00e9rentiel d\u00fb \u00e0 une sous-couverture dans les m\u00e9thodes d\u2019\u00e9chantillonnage.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<h3><strong>Quelles erreurs de correspondance se produisent dans les dossiers administratifs ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nLorsque des dossiers administratifs sont utilis\u00e9s pour faire correspondre des individus ou des m\u00e9nages sp\u00e9cifiques dans diff\u00e9rentes bases de donn\u00e9es, des probl\u00e8mes surviennent. Les personnes utilisent souvent des noms, des surnoms, des noms de jeune fille ou des noms de jeune mari\u00e9e diff\u00e9rents, ce qui rend le processus de mise en correspondance des dossiers avec les r\u00e9pondants \u00e0 l&#039;enqu\u00eate particuli\u00e8rement difficile. En outre, des erreurs administratives peuvent survenir dans les informations vitales n\u00e9cessaires au processus de mise en correspondance. Les enregistrements de date de naissance et d&#039;adresse peuvent \u00e9galement \u00eatre incoh\u00e9rents lorsque les informations sont saisies de mani\u00e8re incorrecte ou que les personnes abr\u00e8gent ou \u00e9pellent diff\u00e9remment des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de leurs adresses.\r\n<h3><strong>Dans quelle mesure les registres administratifs sont-ils pr\u00e9cis dans la saisie de donn\u00e9es sur les m\u00e9nages de non-citoyens ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nLe probl\u00e8me de la non-concordance des dossiers administratifs avec les r\u00e9pondants au recensement est particuli\u00e8rement prononc\u00e9 pour les m\u00e9nages de non-citoyens (m\u00e9nages dont aucun membre n\u2019est citoyen am\u00e9ricain). Ces m\u00e9nages sont les plus difficiles \u00e0 faire correspondre aux dossiers car de nombreux immigrants non-citoyens ne disposent pas des documents n\u00e9cessaires pour fournir des informations pr\u00e9cises sur l\u2019emploi, la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale ou les formulaires IRS.6 De plus, les non-citoyens peuvent \u00e9viter tout contact avec les agences gouvernementales et\/ou fournir des informations incompl\u00e8tes sur le m\u00e9nage.7 Le comptage des m\u00e9nages \u00e0 partir de donn\u00e9es administratives sous-estimerait probablement de mani\u00e8re disproportionn\u00e9e le nombre de m\u00e9nages de non-citoyens.\r\n<blockquote><strong>Le probl\u00e8me de la non-concordance des dossiers administratifs avec les r\u00e9pondants au recensement est particuli\u00e8rement prononc\u00e9 pour les m\u00e9nages non citoyens (m\u00e9nages dont aucun membre n\u2019est citoyen am\u00e9ricain).<\/strong><\/blockquote>\r\n<h3><strong>Comment la sous-couverture et la surcouverture peuvent-elles avoir un impact sur l\u2019exactitude des donn\u00e9es ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nDans les enqu\u00eates, la couverture fait r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la qualit\u00e9 de la collecte des donn\u00e9es sur la population. La sous-couverture se produit lorsque certaines personnes ou unit\u00e9s d&#039;habitation n&#039;ont aucune chance d&#039;\u00eatre s\u00e9lectionn\u00e9es dans l&#039;\u00e9chantillon. La surcouverture se produit lorsque certaines personnes ou erreurs de couverture dans les recherches qui examinent la population plus large sont l\u00e9g\u00e8rement diff\u00e9rentes de celles des enqu\u00eates ; elles se produisent lorsqu&#039;il n&#039;y a pas de couverture suffisante.<strong> informations ou dossiers incomplets provenant de la population en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral<\/strong>.\r\n\r\nIn the case of the census, undercoverage in administrative records occurs when people in administrative records are not matched to their decennial census responses. This leaves people out of the data that state legislatures and governors receive in their states\u2019 Public Law 94-171 summaries."}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>Couverture du Bureau de recensement<\/h3>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<a class=\"button1\" role=\"button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/programs-surveys\/decennial-census\/about\/coverage-measurement.html\">Apprendre encore plus<\/a>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3><strong>Pourquoi les erreurs de couverture sont-elles importantes ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nSurvey research methods select a group of people to study in the hope that the group select\u00aded represents the broader population that they come from, rather than attempting to study an entire population. Therefore, coverage errors in survey research may bias the results and inferences made about the population because the sample does not accurately represent the broader population.\r\n\r\nConclusions drawn from data with undercoverage can speak only about who is included in these records, not about the entire population. For example, if someone wants to know what a city thinks about the mayor and they manage to contact every housing unit in the city, they are missing out on what the homeless population thinks about the mayor. In this example, the study captures only what people who occupy a housing unit think, which is problematic because the homeless population\u2019s opinion of the mayor may be directly related to their cir\u00adcumstances and would yield helpful results in assessments of the mayor\u2019s job performance.\r\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em><strong>En 2010, le Bureau du recensement a constat\u00e9 que les donn\u00e9es du recensement sur les r\u00e9pondants blancs avaient un taux de correspondance de 69,7 pour cent avec les dossiers administratifs, mais les Hispaniques n&#039;avaient qu&#039;un taux de correspondance de 53,2 pour cent, les Am\u00e9ricains d&#039;origine asiatique avaient 671 TP3T, les Noirs avaient 55,21 TP3T et les Am\u00e9rindiens avaient 46,41 TP3T.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/2010census\/pdf\/2010_Census_Match_Study_Report.pdf\">Tableau 18. \u00c9tude de correspondance des recensements de 2010. US Census Bureau\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3><strong>Lors de la mise en correspondance des dossiers administratifs avec les donn\u00e9es du recensement, le taux de correspondance est-il inf\u00e9rieur pour certains groupes que pour d\u2019autres ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nUN <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/2010census\/pdf\/2010_Census_Match_Study_Report.pdf\">\u00c9tude 2010<\/a> assessing the accuracy of administrative data linked with the de\u00adcennial census demonstrated unequal coverage across ethnic groups, with a\r\n\r\nstark difference between the match rates of records for Hispanic and non-Hispanic people. Records matched 78.9 percent of Hispanic respondents and 92.2 percent of non-Hispanic respondents from the 2010 Census. The study also indicated that there was undercoverage of the general population, which means that a portion of the population was not counted.\r\n\r\nThough using administrative records lowers costs, the conclusions that can be drawn from a study in which the Hispanic-origin population is more likely to be left out than the non-Hispanic origin population are limited. Such limitations can be especially problematic when this data is used for purposes such as Voting Rights Act enforcement or redistricting based on citizen voting age population; in these contexts, these biases influence policy and representation.\r\n\r\nWhile general population undercoverage may make a study inaccurate, it is more likely that a study will be inaccurate when the undercoverage is higher for people with specific demo\u00adgraphic characteristics such as race\/ethnicity or citizenship.\r\n<h3><strong>\u00c0 quelle fr\u00e9quence les dossiers administratifs correspondent-ils aux r\u00e9pondants au recensement\u00a0? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nLe Bureau du recensement ne peut pas faire correspondre suffisamment de paires personne-adresse (la combinaison d&#039;une personne et d&#039;une adresse) avec les donn\u00e9es administratives pour g\u00e9n\u00e9rer un d\u00e9compte complet des m\u00e9nages ou des personnes. Sur les 308,7 millions de paires personne-adresse du recensement de 2010, 30% ne correspondaient pas aux registres administratifs. Sur les 279,2 millions de paires personne-adresse du recensement de 2010 qui avaient un identifiant unique, pr\u00e8s d&#039;un quart ne correspondaient pas aux registres administratifs. Si les r\u00e9ponses du recensement et les registres administratifs ne correspondent pas, environ un tiers \u00e0 un quart de la population n&#039;est pas correctement saisie."}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>\u00c9tudes sur les taux de correspondance des recensements<\/h3>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<a class=\"button1\" role=\"button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/library\/visualizations\/2012\/comm\/2010_census_match_study.html\">Apprendre encore plus<\/a>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3><strong>Comment les donn\u00e9es administratives sur la population en \u00e2ge de voter se comparent-elles \u00e0 celles de l\u2019American Community Survey ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nLes donn\u00e9es de l\u2019American Community Survey ont \u00e9t\u00e9 la source d\u2019une application efficace de la loi sur le droit de vote depuis son lancement en 2005. La grande majorit\u00e9 des recherches en sciences sociales8 confirment que les donn\u00e9es de l\u2019ACS sont plus pr\u00e9cises que les donn\u00e9es administratives.\r\n\r\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">EMPORTER:<\/span> Les personnes d&#039;origine hispanique sont plus susceptibles d&#039;\u00eatre associ\u00e9es \u00e0 une adresse erron\u00e9e dans les registres administratifs. L&#039;utilisation d&#039;adresses erron\u00e9es pour red\u00e9finir les circonscriptions des communaut\u00e9s hispaniques les expose au risque de perdre leur repr\u00e9sentation.<\/strong>\r\n\r\nLes recherches du Bureau du recensement ont mis en \u00e9vidence des probl\u00e8mes importants en ce qui concerne l&#039;exactitude des donn\u00e9es administratives. Par exemple, les dossiers administratifs correspondent moins bien aux r\u00e9pondants d&#039;origine hispanique qu&#039;aux r\u00e9pondants d&#039;origine non hispanique.8"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h2>Pr\u00e9occupations concernant la collecte de donn\u00e9es<\/h2>\r\n<h3><strong>Comment le recensement a-t-il \u00e9t\u00e9 historiquement utilis\u00e9 \u00e0 des fins partisanes ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<u><a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/\">Recensement des \u00c9tats-Unis<\/a> <\/u>est cens\u00e9 s&#039;assurer que notre gouvernement repr\u00e9sente fid\u00e8lement nos communaut\u00e9s. Cependant, l&#039;histoire nous montre que ce processus peut \u00eatre utilis\u00e9 comme une arme pour <u><a href=\"https:\/\/www.citylab.com\/equity\/2018\/06\/a-brief-history-of-the-us-census\/564110\/\">gain partisan<\/a><\/u>. By undercounting people of color, particularly people of African descent, Latinxs and Native Americans have had their voices in government diminished.\r\n\r\nBeginning with the <u><a href=\"https:\/\/www.citylab.com\/equity\/2018\/06\/a-brief-history-of-the-us-census\/564110\/\">premier recensement<\/a> <\/u>En 1790, le pouvoir politique \u00e9tait \u00e9troitement li\u00e9 au recensement et les communaut\u00e9s de couleur \u00e9taient d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9ment sous-estim\u00e9es. En 1790, afin d&#039;obtenir plus de pouvoir politique \u00e0 la Chambre des repr\u00e9sentants, les habitants ruraux du sud exigeaient que les esclaves africains soient compt\u00e9s dans le recensement, tandis que les habitants urbains du nord craignaient que leur pouvoir politique ne soit consid\u00e9rablement r\u00e9duit et dilu\u00e9. En tant que compromis imparfait et au m\u00e9pris total de leur humanit\u00e9, pendant plus de 75 ans, les esclaves africains ont \u00e9t\u00e9 compt\u00e9s comme des <u><a href=\"https:\/\/www.citylab.com\/equity\/2018\/06\/a-brief-history-of-the-us-census\/564110\/\">les trois cinqui\u00e8mes d&#039;un \u00eatre humain<\/a><\/u> for the purposes of Congressional representation and taxation. And for nearly 80 years, Native Americans were completely excluded from the census.\r\n\r\nEventually, the census grew to be more detailed and slightly more inclusive and it became the mission of the census to <u><a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/programs-surveys\/decennial-census\/2020-census.html\">\u00ab Compter tout le monde une fois, une seule fois et au bon endroit \u00bb.<\/a><\/u>\r\n\r\nAujourd\u2019hui, de nombreux militants de droite tentent d\u2019utiliser le recensement pour perp\u00e9tuer la tradition consistant \u00e0 faire taire les voix des communaut\u00e9s de couleur. L\u2019administration n\u2019a pas r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 ajouter une question sur la citoyennet\u00e9 au recensement de 2020, mais elle tente toujours d\u2019\u00e9liminer des millions de personnes de la repr\u00e9sentation politique en collectant des donn\u00e9es sur la citoyennet\u00e9 aupr\u00e8s de sources administratives pour ensuite les utiliser dans le processus de red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions. Thomas Hofeller, le cerveau du red\u00e9coupage \u00e9lectoral du Parti r\u00e9publicain, a \u00e9mis l\u2019hypoth\u00e8se que le red\u00e9coupage bas\u00e9 sur la population \u00e9lectorale en \u00e2ge de voter cr\u00e9erait un avantage structurel pour \u00ab les r\u00e9publicains et les blancs non hispaniques \u00bb.\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">EMPORTER:<\/span> Un recensement pr\u00e9cis est la base d&#039;\u00e9lections \u00e9quitables. L&#039;effort visant \u00e0 sous-estimer les communaut\u00e9s de couleur dans le recensement est une tentative de supprimer leurs votes et de revenir \u00e0<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3><strong>Quelles sont les pr\u00e9occupations li\u00e9es aux tableaux de citoyennet\u00e9 au niveau des \u00eelots de recensement ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nThere are two primary concerns that advocates and data scientists have with creating citizen\u00adship tabulations at the census block level.\r\n\r\nFirst, is privacy: The census is meant to summarize group demographics and protect individ\u00aduals\u2019 privacy. The smaller the group, the easier it is to identify the people who make up these groups. In 2016, the Census Bureau conducted a study that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/12\/05\/upshot\/to-reduce-privacy-risks-the-census-plans-to-report-less-accurate-data.html\">trouv\u00e9<\/a> that even after personally\r\n\r\nidentifiable information was removed from census responses, data experts were able to ma\u00adnipulate the data so that individuals or households could be identified by an exact match for fifty percent of people and with \u201cat most one mistake\u201d for ninety percent of people. The bureau is trying to solve this issue of reconstruction with new privacy procedure called differential privacy. However, it is unclear whether this will entirely prevent the match of census data with personally identifiable information. Ensuring that personally identifiable information is confidential is especially important when data such as citizenship is included. Although it is a violation of the Census Act to manipulate census data to identify an individual or to use it for law enforcement, there is a real fear of the consequences of unprotected census data, particularly among immigrant communities of color.\r\n\r\nSecond, is citizen voting age population (CVAP) redistricting: Politicians who want to ma\u00adnipulate redistricting by excluding noncitizens and anyone under the age of eighteen need data in order to effectively draw gerrymandered maps that can withstand legal challenges. The citizenship data collected and made compatible with the redistricting file sent to states pursuant to the Census Bureau\u2019s directive may provide the necessary quality of data to draw legally sufficient maps. The collection and inclusion of this data is part of a long term strategy by some Republicans to solidify partisan power and exclude people living in the U.S. who are not U.S. citizens and minors from representation.\r\n\r\nThis would be a major blow to our voting rights and representation in government. Allowing un\u00adreliable citizenship data to play a role in redistricting would boost the number of representatives that less diverse commu\u00adnities receive while diminishing the rep\u00adresentation of urban, immigrant-friendly areas of equal population. Lawmakers in Texas, Arizona, Missouri and Nebraska have already said that they would con\u00adsider making use of the citizenship data for redistricting purposes if it became available.\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">EMPORTER:<\/span> Perdre sa repr\u00e9sentation signifie perdre sa voix dans les discussions importantes sur les ressources et les politiques. Les endroits o\u00f9 il y a plus d&#039;enfants, d&#039;immigrants et de personnes de couleur pourraient voir leur voix r\u00e9duite au silence.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3><strong>Comment l\u2019environnement anti-immigr\u00e9s actuel pourrait-il affecter le recensement et vice versa ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nAccording to prevailing research, heightened immigration enforcement would lead to lower political participation among Latinx and immigrant communities because of the intimidat\u00ading effect. Though almost all jurisdictions require people to be citizens in order to vote in elections, people who have personal relationships with noncitizens are less likely to interact with government, including participating in the census or in elections. People with unstable immigration statuses are less likely to fill out the census questionnaire because they are less likely to trust the government.10\r\n\r\nIn a 1995 ethnographic study, one of the respondents had legal citizenship as a student but feared participating in the census because she believed the information could be used to track her down in the future if she lost that legal status. Mixed-status households \u2014 households composed of members with different citizenship or immigration statuses (e.g., undocumented immigrants, citizens, legal residents) \u2014 are likely to avoid contact with governmental institu\u00adtions when they suspect it is not safe to do so.11\r\n\r\nHeightened \u201cimmigration policing\u201d erodes trust in public institutions and forces immigrant communities, including U.S.-born Latinxs who have immigrant parents or feel connected to the immigrant community, to be very selective in deciding when, where and how they engage with public institutions.12 This includes interactions with vital public institutions, such as those involving health care, law enforcement and education.13\r\n\r\nWhile the debate around the inclusion of citizenship data in 2020 may have increased com\u00admunities\u2019 concern that the data could heighten immigration enforcement in the future, the confidentiality protections currently in place prevent these concerns from becoming reality.\r\n<h3><strong>Les donn\u00e9es du recensement ont-elles d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 utilis\u00e9es par le gouvernement pour cibler des groupes de personnes ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nCensus data on race and ethnicity was used to aid in Japanese Internment during World War II and was used again in the 2000s to identify geographies with large Arab ancestry popu\u00adlations under the George W. Bush administration. These data uses were legal at the time of both instances. Notably, confidentiality safeguards have now been adopted to prevent similar census data use in the future, and penalties for this misuse are prohibitively high.14\r\n\r\nDuring World War II, the Department of War coordinated Japanese American internment efforts15 in California, Oregon and Washington using Census Bureau data. The Second War Powers Act of 1942 temporarily lifted data protections that barred the bureau from revealing data linked to specific individuals. The bureau initially <strong><u>admis <\/u><\/strong>to sharing only aggregated population totals so that the Department of War could identify localities to target for its in\u00adternment efforts. Research later revealed that the bureau also shared personal records for residents of Washington, D.C., who reported Japanese ancestry on the decennial census. This instance of data sharing was legal at the time that it occurred.\r\n\r\nIn 2004, it was revealed that the Census Bureau shared aggregated totals on Arab ancestry with the Department of Homeland Security. Special tabulations were prepared for law enforce\u00adment on Arab Americans from the 2000 decennial census. This action was within the Census Bureau\u2019s authority at the time. One <u><a href=\"https:\/\/epic.org\/privacy\/census\/foia\/tab_1.pdf\">source<\/a> <\/u>contient des tableaux sp\u00e9ciaux sur les grandes villes comptant plus d&#039;un millier d&#039;habitants qui ont d\u00e9clar\u00e9 leur ascendance arabe en 2000. L&#039;autre <u><a href=\"https:\/\/epic.org\/privacy\/census\/foia\/tab_2.pdf\">source<\/a> <\/u>used ZIP-code-level tabulations in which Arab ancestry was broken down into categories of \u201cEgyp\u00adtian,\u201d \u201cIraqi,\u201d \u201cJordanian,\u201d \u201cLebanese,\u201d \u201cMoroccan,\u201d \u201cPalestinian,\u201d \u201cSyrian,\u201d \u201cArab\/Arabic\u201d and \u201cOther Arab.\u201d These tabulations were compiled using the responses from the census long-form, which goes to only a sample of census respondents, so tabulations at lower levels of census geography were not necessarily representative of population totals. Requests for special tabulations on sensitive populations made by federal, state or local law enforcement\r\n\r\nand intelligence agencies using Title 13 of the U.S. Code (or Census Act) protected data now require prior approval from the appropriate associate director of the government agency.\r\n\r\nUnder confidentiality protections today, these uses would be deemed illegal, and there would be legal penalties for these violations. There is currently no credible reason to suspect that similar data shar\u00ading will happen with the 2020 decennial census data under our current laws, but such violations would face criminal sanc\u00adtions.\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">EMPORTER:<\/span> L\u2019utilisation des donn\u00e9es de recensement sur la citoyennet\u00e9 pour le red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions \u00e9lectorales est un exemple de discrimination l\u00e9gale et structurelle. L\u2019utilisation de ces donn\u00e9es pour le contr\u00f4le de l\u2019immigration est toutefois ill\u00e9gale.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n(Trouvez plus d&#039;informations sur le partage des donn\u00e9es de recensement de <u><a href=\"https:\/\/epic.org\/privacy\/census\/foia\/tab_2.pdf\">R\u00e9pondants d&#039;origine arabe<\/a> <\/u>et <u><a href=\"https:\/\/censuscounts.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/AAJC-LCCR-Census-Confidentiality-Factsheet-FINAL-4.26.2018.pdf\">R\u00e9pondants am\u00e9ricains d&#039;origine japonaise<\/a><\/u>, et sur le recensement<strong> <u>protection de la vie priv\u00e9e et de la confidentialit\u00e9<\/u><\/strong> aux hyperliens.)"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h2>Protections des donn\u00e9es existantes<\/h2>\r\n<h3><strong>Comment les donn\u00e9es collect\u00e9es lors du recensement sont-elles prot\u00e9g\u00e9es par le Bureau du recensement ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nCensus data from paper responses is reported to the bureau as millions of individual records. Once data is collected, it is processed by Census Bureau staff to remove personally identifiable information. Then it is aggregated and run through additional privacy protection algorithms.\r\n\r\nData from online responses, on the other hand, is immediately converted into a form that cannot be easily understood by unauthorized people. The data is encrypted twice (once after the participant hits \u201cSubmit\u201d on the online form and again after responses reach the Census Bureau\u2019s database).\r\n\r\nLists of individuals\u2019 records (microdata) will be housed at the Census Bureau, but the aggre\u00adgate data are publicly available.\r\n\r\nThere are also significant legal protections that prohibit the data from being misused or to target individuals for law or immigration enforcement actions.\r\n<h3><strong>Comment le Bureau du recensement aborde-t-il l\u2019\u00e9ventuelle \u00ab reconstruction \u00bb des donn\u00e9es \u00e0 partir des statistiques du Bureau du recensement ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nEn 2016, le Bureau du recensement a men\u00e9 une \u00e9tude qui a r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 que m\u00eame apr\u00e8s que les informations personnelles identifiables ont \u00e9t\u00e9 supprim\u00e9es des r\u00e9ponses au recensement, les experts en donn\u00e9es ont pu recr\u00e9er les donn\u00e9es afin que les individus ou les m\u00e9nages puissent \u00eatre identifi\u00e9s par une correspondance exacte pour cinquante pour cent des personnes et avec <u>\u00ab<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/12\/05\/upshot\/to-reduce-privacy-risks-the-census-plans-to-report-less-accurate-data.html\">\u00ab au plus une erreur \u00bb pour quatre-vingt-dix pour cent des gens.<\/a><\/u> This process is known as \u201creconstruction.\u201d\r\n\r\nTo address reconstruction issues in the past, the Census Bureau swapped responses from some respondents before releasing the full dataset. In 2020, The bureau will implement a new proce\u00addure called differential privacy, which provides \u201cstatistical guarantees against what an adversary can infer from learning the results of some randomized algorithm.\u201d16 During this process, random error is introduced to aggregate data to ensure that the chances of guessing a person\u2019s responses accurately are similar to the chances of accurately reconstructing an individual\u2019s actual census responses given all of the aggregate census data that one has access to. That is, a person\u2019s ability to reconstruct individuals\u2019 respons\u00ades is no better than their ability to guess them without the data. Differential priva\u00adcy takes into account that some demo\u00adgraphic characteristics are less common in certain geographies, so it applies more random error to these people\u2019s responses in the publicly available aggregate tables.\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">EMPORTER:<\/span> Le Bureau du recensement rend plus difficile la tra\u00e7abilit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es de recensement jusqu&#039;\u00e0 la personne qui les a soumises.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3><strong>Quelles protections juridiques en mati\u00e8re de confidentialit\u00e9 s\u2019appliquent aux donn\u00e9es de recensement et administratives ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nThe confidentiality provision of the Census Act (also known as Title 13 of the U.S. Code) pro\u00advides broad protections for the confidentiality of census data and any administrative data that is combined with the census data. If the Census Bureau or \u201cother federal, state, local, and tribal governmental agencies, as well the private sector,\u201d uses statistical products made from administrative data on citizenship to harm small geographies with large noncitizen populations, those violations are subject to penalties outlined in the privacy protections.17\r\n\r\nConfidentiality restrictions on administrative records and on statistical products legally pro\u00adtect populations against targeting by law enforcement.\r\n\r\nNeither the Census Bureau nor anyone who works for it may use the information gathered in the census or disclose the personally identifiable information gathered in the census under penalty of law. Census Bureau employees are required to swear an oath of confidentiality, and anyone outside of the Census Bureau cannot see individual census responses.\r\n\r\nFinally, and most importantly, no data collected by the Census Bureau may be used without the consent of the individual as evidence or for any enforcement action, lawsuit, or judicial or administrative proceeding.18\r\n\r\n(Find more information on <u><a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/federal-laws-protect-census-confidentiality\">confidentialit\u00e9 du recensement<\/a> <\/u>et <u><a href=\"https:\/\/www2.census.gov\/foia\/ds_policies\/ds001_appendices.pdf\">protection contre l&#039;utilisation malveillante des donn\u00e9es<\/a> <\/u>aux hyperliens. Voir ceci <u><a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/sites\/default\/files\/publications\/2019_02_Census%20Brief_v4.pdf\">rapport<\/a> <\/u>(du Brennan Center for Justice, qui explique plus en d\u00e9tail la confidentialit\u00e9 du recensement.)\r\n<h3><strong>Quelles protections existent pour le partage de donn\u00e9es entre les agences r\u00e9pertori\u00e9es dans le d\u00e9cret de Trump ? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\nThe Census Bureau regularly enters agreements with other agencies and departments to re\u00adceive administrative records. In compliance with Title 13 of the U.S. Code, the bureau strips personally identifiable information from the records it gets from other departments and is legally prohibited from sending those records back to the Department of Homeland Security (including U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement).\r\n\r\nSection 552(a) of the <u><a href=\"http:\/\/www.osec.doc.gov\/opog\/privacy\/Memorandums\/Privacy_Act-1974-USC552A.pdf\">Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels<\/a> <\/u>La loi autorise le partage des donn\u00e9es des individus avec le Bureau du recensement \u00e0 des fins statistiques, mais les autres agences ne peuvent pas partager ces dossiers entre elles sans le consentement \u00e9crit de la personne concern\u00e9e par le dossier. La seule utilisation en dehors de cette restriction est la transmission des donn\u00e9es entre agences administratives (pas le Bureau du recensement) \u00e0 des fins d&#039;application de la loi, mais 22 m\u00eame cette utilisation n\u00e9cessite que le responsable d&#039;une agence fasse une demande \u00e9crite \u00e0 l&#039;agence dont il souhaite acc\u00e9der aux dossiers. Le responsable de l&#039;agence doit \u00e9galement sp\u00e9cifier exactement la partie du dossier qu&#039;il souhaite consulter et l&#039;activit\u00e9 d&#039;application de la loi pour laquelle il sera utilis\u00e9.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">EMPORTER:<\/span> Plusieurs mesures de protection juridiques sont en place pour emp\u00eacher que les donn\u00e9es de recensement sur la citoyennet\u00e9 soient utilis\u00e9es \u00e0 des fins d&#039;immigration ou d&#039;application de la loi. Ces donn\u00e9es sont destin\u00e9es \u00e0 la redistribution des circonscriptions et \u00e0 l&#039;influence sur les politiques et les lois.<\/strong><\/span>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h3>Le Bureau du recensement sur le partage des donn\u00e9es<\/h3>\r\n<a class=\"button1\" role=\"button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/2019\/data-sharing-agreements.html\">Lire la d\u00e9claration<\/a>"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h2>Termes<\/h2>\r\n<strong><u>Donn\u00e9es administratives<\/u><\/strong> (Dossiers administratifs) : Tous les dossiers que les agences collectent et conservent pour administrer les programmes qu\u2019elles g\u00e8rent.\r\n\r\n<strong><u>Enqu\u00eate sur la communaut\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaine<\/u><\/strong> (ACS) : Enqu\u00eate annuelle envoy\u00e9e \u00e0 un \u00e9chantillon al\u00e9atoire de m\u00e9nages aux \u00c9tats-Unis pour en savoir plus sur les caract\u00e9ristiques des communaut\u00e9s am\u00e9ricaines. On pose aux r\u00e9pondants des questions sur leurs revenus, leur citoyennet\u00e9, leur race et leur origine ethnique, etc.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/legislative-apportionment\"><strong><u>R\u00e9partition<\/u><\/strong><\/a>:R\u00e9partition des 435 circonscriptions de la Chambre des repr\u00e9sentants des \u00c9tats-Unis entre les \u00c9tats en fonction de la population totale de chaque \u00c9tat. La r\u00e9partition a lieu apr\u00e8s chaque recensement d\u00e9cennal.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/programs-surveys\/decennial-census\/about\/voting-rights\/cvap.html\"><strong><u>Population citoyenne en \u00e2ge de voter<\/u><\/strong> <\/a>(population citoyenne en \u00e2ge de voter) : nombre de personnes vivant dans une zone sp\u00e9cifique, comme un bloc de recensement ou un district du Congr\u00e8s, qui sont des citoyens \u00e2g\u00e9s de 18 ans ou plus. Ces donn\u00e9es sont actuellement obtenues \u00e0 partir de l&#039;American Community Survey (ACS). Il s&#039;agit d&#039;un tableau sp\u00e9cial fournissant des donn\u00e9es sur la population citoyenne en \u00e2ge de voter par race et origine ethnique.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/programs-surveys\/decennial-census\/about\/voting-rights\/cvap.html\"><strong><u>Red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions \u00e9lectorales de la population en \u00e2ge de voter (CVAP)<\/u><\/strong><\/a>:Une tentative de permettre aux \u00c9tats d&#039;effacer les non-citoyens et les mineurs de la repr\u00e9sentation dans les cartes l\u00e9gislatives et du Congr\u00e8s en les omettant d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9ment du d\u00e9compte utilis\u00e9 pour dessiner les districts. \u00c9galement appel\u00e9 population citoyenne \u00e9ligible au vote.\r\n\r\n<strong>Couverture <\/strong>(<strong><u>sous-couverture<\/u><\/strong>, sur-couverture) : cela fait r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la part de la population qui est surrepr\u00e9sent\u00e9e ou sous-repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e dans un ensemble de donn\u00e9es.\r\n\r\n<strong><u>Recensement d\u00e9cennal<\/u><\/strong>:Un d\u00e9compte de toutes les personnes vivant aux \u00c9tats-Unis que la Constitution exige que le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral effectue au d\u00e9but de chaque d\u00e9cennie (tous les 10 ans).\r\n\r\n<strong><u>Microdonn\u00e9es<\/u><\/strong>:Donn\u00e9es sur des individus sp\u00e9cifiques.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/content\/dam\/Census\/library\/publications\/2012\/dec\/2010_cpex_247.pdf\"><strong><u>Paires personne-adresse<\/u><\/strong><\/a>: Combinaison d&#039;une personne unique et d&#039;une adresse. Ces donn\u00e9es sont utilis\u00e9es pour relier les dossiers administratifs aux r\u00e9pondants du recensement.\r\n\r\n<strong><u>Loi publique 94-171<\/u><\/strong>: Fournit des tableaux de population sur de petites zones \u00e0 chacune des 50 l\u00e9gislatures d&#039;\u00c9tat et \u00e0 leurs gouverneurs de mani\u00e8re non partisane. Ces donn\u00e9es sont fournies au plus tard un an apr\u00e8s le recensement d\u00e9cennal.\r\n\r\n<strong><u>Red\u00e9coupage \u00e9lectoral<\/u><\/strong>:La configuration et la reconfiguration des limites g\u00e9ographiques des circonscriptions \u00e9lectorales pour d\u00e9terminer la repr\u00e9sentation au sein d&#039;un organisme gouvernemental (par exemple, le Congr\u00e8s, les assembl\u00e9es l\u00e9gislatives d&#039;\u00c9tat, les conseils municipaux, les conseils scolaires, les commissions de comt\u00e9). Lors du red\u00e9coupage, les lignes sont redessin\u00e9es pour d\u00e9terminer les limites g\u00e9ographiques des circonscriptions que les \u00e9lus repr\u00e9senteront.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/science\/sampling-statistics\"><strong><u>\u00c9chantillonnage<\/u><\/strong><\/a>: Proc\u00e9d\u00e9 ou m\u00e9thode permettant d&#039;obtenir des informations \u00e0 partir d&#039;un sous-ensemble plus restreint, s\u00e9lectionn\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re al\u00e9atoire, d&#039;une population plus large afin de d\u00e9duire des informations sur cette population plus large. L&#039;\u00e9chantillonnage et l&#039;inf\u00e9rence statistique sont utilis\u00e9s dans les cas o\u00f9 il est impossible d&#039;obtenir des informations de chaque membre de la population.\r\n\r\n<strong><u>Tabulation<\/u><\/strong>:Le processus de placement de donn\u00e9es classifi\u00e9es sous forme de tableau (r\u00e9sum\u00e9)."}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<hr \/>\r\n\r\n<h2>Endnotes<\/h2>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Census Bur Redistricting File (Public Law 94-171) Dataset. February 03, 2011. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/data\/datasets\/2010\/dec\/redistricting-file-pl-94-171.html\">https:\/\/www.census.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/data\/datasets\/2010\/dec\/redistricting-file-pl-94-171.html\">gov\/data\/datasets\/2010\/dec\/redistricting-file-pl-94-171.html<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>Defined by the Statistical Programs and Standards office of the S. Office of Management and Budget in Directive 15 (issued in 1977 and revised in 1997). Originally, race tabulation groups included \u201cwhite,\u201d \u201cblack,\u201d \u201cAmerican Indian\/Alaska Native,\u201d \u201cAsian\/Pacific Islander,\u201d and \u201csome other race.\u201d<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Requested by the state legislatures and Department of Justice for the 1990 Census Redistricting Data<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30, 50-51 [1986]. <a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/478\/30\">https:\/\/suprjustia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/478\/30<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Groen, 2012. \u201cSources of Error in Survey and Administrative Data: The Importance of Reporting Procedures.\u201d <em>Journal of Official Statistics <\/em>28 (2): 173\u201398.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Coutin, Susan 2003. <em>Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants\u2019 Struggle for U.S. Residency<\/em>. University of Michigan Press.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Hagan, Jacqueline 1994. <em>Deciding to Be Legal: A Maya Community in Houston<\/em>. Temple University Press.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Census Bur American Community Survey. Coverage Rates and Definitions. July 12, 2018. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/programs-surveys\/acs\/methodology\/sample-size-and-data-quality\/coverage-rates-\">https:\/\/www.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/programs-surveys\/acs\/methodology\/sample-size-and-data-quality\/coverage-rates-\">census.gov\/programs-surveys\/acs\/methodology\/sample-size-and-data-quality\/coverage-rates-definitions<\/a>. html.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Van Hook, Jennifer, and James 2013. \u201cCitizenship Reporting in the American Community Survey.\u201d <em>Demographic Research<\/em>29 (1): 1\u201332. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4054\/DemRes.2013.29.1\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4054\/DemRes.2013.29.1.<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>De La Puente, 2004. \u201cCensus 2000 Ethnographic Studies.\u201d U.S. Census Bureau, p. 15. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/pred\/www\/rpts\/Ethnographic%20Studies%20Final%20Report.pdf\">https:\/\/<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/pred\/www\/rpts\/Ethnographic%20Studies%20Final%20Report.pdf\">www.census.gov\/pred\/www\/rpts\/Ethnographic%20Studies%20Final%20Report.pdf<\/a><u>.<\/u><\/li>\r\n \t<li>De La Puente, 1995. \u201cUsing Ethnography to Explain Why People Are Missed or Erroneously Included by the Census: Evidence from Small Area Ethnographic Studies.\u201d U.S. Census Bureau.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Nichols, Vanessa Cruz, Alana W. LeBr\u00f3n, and Francisco I. Pedraza. 2018. \u201cPolicing Us Sick: The Health of Latinos in an Era of Heightened Deportations and Racialized Policing.\u201d PS: Political Science &amp; Politics 51 (2): 293\u201397. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1049096517002384\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1049096517002384<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Pedraza, Francisco , and Maricruz Ariana Osorio. 2017. \u201cCourted and Deported: The Salience of Immigration Issues and Avoidance of Police, Health Care, and Education Services among Latinos.\u201d <em>Aztlan: A <\/em><em>Journal of Chicano Studies <\/em>42 (2): 249\u201366.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Asian Americans Advancing Factsheet on the Census, Confidentiality and Japanese American Incarceration. <a href=\"https:\/\/censuscounts.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/AAJC-LCCR-Census-Confidentiality-Factsheet-FINAL\">https:\/\/censuscounts.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/AAJC-LCCR-Census-Confidentiality-<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/censuscounts.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/AAJC-LCCR-Census-Confidentiality-Factsheet-FINAL\">Factsheet-FINAL-4.26.2018.pdf<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>The forced removal and incarceration of over 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Dwork, 2011. \u201cDifferential Privacy.\u201d In <em>Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security<\/em>, edited by Henk C. A. van Tilborg and Sushil Jajodia, 338\u201340. Boston, MA: Springer. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4419-5906-5_752\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4419-<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4419-5906-5_752\">5906-5_752<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>U.S. Census Bur 2018. \u201cHandbook for Administrative Data Projects.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.census.gov\/foia\/ds_policies\/ds001_appendices.pdf\">https:\/\/www2.census.gov\/foia\/<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.census.gov\/foia\/ds_policies\/ds001_appendices.pdf\">ds_policies\/ds001_appendices.pdf<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>U.S. Title 13. Section 9. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/USCODE-2007-title13\/pdf\/USCODE-2007-title13.pdf\">https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/USCODE-2007-title13\/pdf\/USCODE-<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/USCODE-2007-title13\/pdf\/USCODE-2007-title13.pdf\">2007-title13.pdf<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;"}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_add_component","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_add_component":null},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_work","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_work":{"heading":"Work","manually_curate":false,"work":null}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_resources","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_resources":{"heading":"Related Resources","button_text":"See all Related Resources","manually_curate":false,"resource":null}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Whitewashing Representation - Common Cause<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/ressources-2\/representation-de-blanchiment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Whitewashing Representation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/ressources-2\/representation-de-blanchiment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Common Cause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-10T19:58:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CommonCause\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/\",\"name\":\"Whitewashing Representation - Common Cause\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-17T20:44:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-10T19:58:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Whitewashing Representation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"width\":2066,\"height\":331,\"caption\":\"Common Cause\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Repr\u00e9sentation du blanchiment \u2013 Cause commune","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/ressources-2\/representation-de-blanchiment\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Whitewashing Representation","og_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/ressources-2\/representation-de-blanchiment\/","og_site_name":"Common Cause","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","article_modified_time":"2024-07-10T19:58:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@CommonCause","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/","name":"Repr\u00e9sentation du blanchiment \u2013 Cause commune","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-17T20:44:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-10T19:58:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/resources\/whitewashing-representation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Whitewashing Representation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","name":"Cause commune","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization","name":"Cause commune","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","width":2066,"height":331,"caption":"Common Cause"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/"]}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Common Cause","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/14106","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/14106\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21039,"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/14106\/revisions\/21039"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14106"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}