{"id":7908,"date":"2023-03-20T13:49:51","date_gmt":"2023-03-20T17:49:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/"},"modified":"2023-03-20T13:49:51","modified_gmt":"2023-03-20T17:49:51","slug":"le-depot-dune-procedure-par-la-cour-supreme-dans-une-affaire-de-redecoupage-electoral-en-caroline-du-nord-ne-modifie-pas-la-capacite-de-statuer-dans-laffaire-moore-contre-harper","status":"publish","type":"press","link":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/press\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u00e9p\u00f4t devant la Cour supr\u00eame : les proc\u00e9dures dans l&#039;affaire de red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions de la Caroline du Nord ne modifient pas la capacit\u00e9 de d\u00e9cider Moore c. Harper"},"template":"","class_list":["post-7908","press","type-press","status-publish","hentry","press_type-press-release"],"acf":{"details":{"summary":"The U.S. Supreme Court should reject the dangerous and fringe independent state legislature theory (ISLT) presented in Moore v. Harper regardless of the highly unusual decision by the North Carolina Supreme Court to rehear the remedial decision in Harper v. Hall, according to a new plaintiff\u2019s letter responding to the high court.  \r\n\r\n","featured_image":"","press_type":236,"authors":[null],"related_issues":[103,113,169,2066,2082],"related_work":false,"location":46},"sidebar":{"helper_enable_sidebar":false,"helper_media_contact":{"heading":"Media Contact","manually_enter_person":false,"person":null,"name":"","role":"","phone":"","email":""},"helper_links_downloads":{"heading":"Links & Downloads","links":null}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"WASHINGTON, DC \u2014 La Cour supr\u00eame des \u00c9tats-Unis devrait rejeter la th\u00e9orie dangereuse et marginale de l&#039;ind\u00e9pendance l\u00e9gislative des \u00c9tats (ISLT) pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e dans\u00a0<em>Moore c. Harper<\/em>\u00a0malgr\u00e9 la d\u00e9cision tr\u00e8s inhabituelle de la Cour supr\u00eame de Caroline du Nord de r\u00e9examiner la d\u00e9cision corrective en\u00a0<em>Harper c. Hall<\/em>, according to a new plaintiff\u2019s letter responding to the high court.\r\n\r\n\u201cThis Court retains jurisdiction over this case regardless of the outcome of the North Carolina Supreme Court\u2019s rehearing proceedings in\u00a0<em>Harper II<\/em>\u201d, indique la lettre. \u201cLes p\u00e9titionnaires demandent \u00e0 cette Cour de d\u00e9cider si les tribunaux d\u2019\u00c9tat peuvent jouer\u00a0<em>n&#039;importe quel r\u00f4le<\/em>\u00a0dans l&#039;arbitrage des cartes de red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions du Congr\u00e8s. Peu importe la fa\u00e7on dont la Cour supr\u00eame de Caroline du Nord statue sur la r\u00e9audition de\u00a0<em>Harper II<\/em>, cette question restera d\u2019actualit\u00e9 devant cette Cour.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Moore-Supplemental-Brief-3-20-23-Final.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Lisez la lettre d\u2019information compl\u00e9mentaire compl\u00e8te ici.<\/a>\r\n\r\nLa Cour supr\u00eame des \u00c9tats-Unis a demand\u00e9 un compl\u00e9ment d&#039;information\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0le 2 mars 2023, demandant aux parties quel \u00e9tait l&#039;effet sur sa comp\u00e9tence suite \u00e0 la r\u00e9audition par la Cour supr\u00eame de Caroline du Nord de la d\u00e9cision du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2022 dans\u00a0<em>Harper c. Hall<\/em>. Cette d\u00e9cision,\u00a0<em>Harper II<\/em>, considered whether the remedial maps used in the 2022 election were still unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders.\r\n\r\nThe North Carolina Supreme Court\u2019s earlier February 2022 opinion,\u00a0<em>Harper I<\/em>, a invalid\u00e9 les cartes l\u00e9gislatives et du Congr\u00e8s originales de 2021 adopt\u00e9es par la l\u00e9gislature de Caroline du Nord en tant que d\u00e9coupages \u00e9lectoraux inconstitutionnels, et c&#039;est la d\u00e9cision qui a fait l&#039;objet d&#039;un appel devant la Cour supr\u00eame des \u00c9tats-Unis en\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>.\r\n\r\nOral arguments in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0a eu lieu le 7 d\u00e9cembre 2022. \u00c0 cette date, la Cour supr\u00eame de Caroline du Nord avait d\u00e9j\u00e0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/north-carolina-supreme-court-rejects-gamesmanship-in-latest-redistricting-opinion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">rejet\u00e9 les jeux de cartes dans\u00a0<em>Harper II<\/em><\/a>\u00a0en jugeant le d\u00e9coupage partisan de mani\u00e8re disproportionn\u00e9e et inconstitutionnelle, il s&#039;est fait au d\u00e9triment des \u00e9lecteurs minoritaires de l&#039;\u00c9tat. Cependant, une fois que le tribunal de Caroline du Nord a modifi\u00e9 la composition partisane au d\u00e9but de 2023, il\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/nc-supreme-court-majority-breaks-precedent-to-rehear-settled-redistricting-voter-id-cases-post-election\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">a obtenu une r\u00e9audition de la d\u00e9cision corrective ult\u00e9rieure<\/a>\u00a0publi\u00e9 en d\u00e9cembre \u00e0 la demande des l\u00e9gislateurs r\u00e9publicains. Le temps est venu de r\u00e9examiner\u00a0<em>Harper I<\/em>\u00a0is long past, but legislators have asked the North Carolina Supreme Court to overrule that decision as well.\r\n\r\nSome court watchers have questioned whether the move in North Carolina would moot the\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0affaire. Le m\u00e9moire compl\u00e9mentaire d\u00e9pos\u00e9 aujourd&#039;hui par\u00a0<strong>Neal Kumar Katyal, associ\u00e9 chez Hogan Lovells\u00a0<\/strong>et co-avocat de la Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ) repr\u00e9sentant le plaignant Common Cause, ont expliqu\u00e9 pourquoi les proc\u00e9dures de l&#039;\u00c9tat ne modifient pas la capacit\u00e9 de la Cour supr\u00eame \u00e0 rendre une d\u00e9cision dans\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>:\r\n\r\n\u201cThis Court should not wait until this question comes before it on an emergency basis in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle,\u201d wrote Katyal, who also argued the case before the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in December 2022. \u201cThe question presented is fully briefed, thoroughly argued, and ripe for decision. This Court is the only forum that can definitively resolve that question and provide guidance to state legislatures and state courts across the country.\u201d\r\n\r\nVoting rights advocates have called\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0ISLT argument a grave threat to democracy. The legislators who subscribe to this theory pervert the Elections Clause in the U.S. Constitution to assert that state legislatures alone have the power to determine how federal district maps should be drawn, and furthermore that state courts cannot intervene in that process, nor can state constitutions be enforced if they are contrary to the will of a group of lawmakers who seek to entrench their power.\r\n\r\n\u201cWe knew from the start this brazen power grab was wrong and flew in the faces of the U.S and North Carolina Constitutions,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Bob Phillips, directeur ex\u00e9cutif de Common Cause North Carolina<\/strong>. \u201cNothing has changed on that front. We need the U.S. Supreme Court to toss this nonsensical \u2018independent state legislature theory\u2019 into the dustbin where it belongs \u2014 and there is no better time than now when we aren\u2019t on the eve of a major election.\u201d\r\n\r\nOral arguments in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0lasted three and a half hours, a lengthy period of time in which the U.S. Supreme Court Justices examined the flimsy legal underpinnings of the dangerous ISLT that would erode people\u2019s voting rights.\r\n\r\n\u201cISLT was wrong when this matter was briefed and argued before the Supreme Court in 2022, and it remains wrong in 2023,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Hilary Harris Klein, avocate principale pour le droit de vote \u00e0 la SCSJ<\/strong>. \u201cNothing that has happened in the state proceedings has changed this fact, and the arguments and briefing show definitively that voters deserve an unambiguous rejection of this dangerous theory by our country\u2019s highest court.\u201d\r\n\r\nA decision in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0is expected early this summer.\r\n\r\n\u201cChecks and balances were embedded throughout our Constitution to prevent any one person, group or political party from unjustly seizing power that rightly belongs to the people,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Kathay Feng, vice-pr\u00e9sidente des programmes de Common Cause<\/strong>\u00ab La Cour supr\u00eame des \u00c9tats-Unis, lorsqu\u2019elle rendra sa d\u00e9cision dans quelques mois, devra rejeter cette tentative irresponsable de donner aux l\u00e9gislateurs des \u00c9tats un pouvoir illimit\u00e9 de manipulation de nos \u00e9lections. \u00bb\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/north-carolina\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Cause commune<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0est une organisation non partisane et populaire qui se consacre \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense des valeurs fondamentales de la d\u00e9mocratie am\u00e9ricaine. Nous travaillons \u00e0 cr\u00e9er un gouvernement ouvert, honn\u00eate et responsable qui sert l&#039;int\u00e9r\u00eat public ; \u00e0 promouvoir l&#039;\u00e9galit\u00e9 des droits, des opportunit\u00e9s et de la repr\u00e9sentation pour tous ; et \u00e0 permettre \u00e0 tous de faire entendre leur voix dans le processus politique.<\/em>\r\n\r\n<em>La Southern Coalition for Social Justice, fond\u00e9e en 2007, s&#039;associe aux communaut\u00e9s de couleur et aux communaut\u00e9s \u00e9conomiquement d\u00e9favoris\u00e9es du Sud pour d\u00e9fendre et faire progresser leurs droits politiques, sociaux et \u00e9conomiques gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 une combinaison de plaidoyer juridique, de recherche, d&#039;organisation et de communication. Pour en savoir plus, consultez le site\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.southerncoalition.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>coalitiondusud.org<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0et suivez notre travail sur\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/scsj\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Gazouillement<\/em><\/a><em>,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/southerncoalition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Facebook<\/em><\/a><em>, et\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/scsjofficial\/?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Instagram<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em>"}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/press-releases\/le-depot-dune-procedure-par-la-cour-supreme-dans-une-affaire-de-redecoupage-electoral-en-caroline-du-nord-ne-modifie-pas-la-capacite-de-statuer-dans-laffaire-moore-contre-harper\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/presse\/le-depot-dune-procedure-par-la-cour-supreme-dans-une-affaire-de-redecoupage-electoral-en-caroline-du-nord-ne-modifie-pas-la-capacite-de-statuer-dans-laffaire-moore-contre-harper\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Common Cause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CommonCause\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\",\"name\":\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-20T17:49:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"width\":2066,\"height\":331,\"caption\":\"Common Cause\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"D\u00e9p\u00f4t d&#039;une requ\u00eate devant la Cour supr\u00eame\u00a0: la proc\u00e9dure de red\u00e9coupage \u00e9lectoral en Caroline du Nord ne modifie pas la capacit\u00e9 de d\u00e9cision dans l&#039;affaire Moore c. Harper \u2013 Common Cause","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/press-releases\/le-depot-dune-procedure-par-la-cour-supreme-dans-une-affaire-de-redecoupage-electoral-en-caroline-du-nord-ne-modifie-pas-la-capacite-de-statuer-dans-laffaire-moore-contre-harper\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper","og_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/presse\/le-depot-dune-procedure-par-la-cour-supreme-dans-une-affaire-de-redecoupage-electoral-en-caroline-du-nord-ne-modifie-pas-la-capacite-de-statuer-dans-laffaire-moore-contre-harper\/","og_site_name":"Common Cause","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@CommonCause","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","name":"D\u00e9p\u00f4t d&#039;une requ\u00eate devant la Cour supr\u00eame\u00a0: la proc\u00e9dure de red\u00e9coupage \u00e9lectoral en Caroline du Nord ne modifie pas la capacit\u00e9 de d\u00e9cision dans l&#039;affaire Moore c. Harper \u2013 Common Cause","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-03-20T17:49:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","name":"Cause commune","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization","name":"Cause commune","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","width":2066,"height":331,"caption":"Common Cause"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/"]}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Common Cause","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/7908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/press"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/7908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}