{"id":15682,"date":"2024-02-08T14:48:20","date_gmt":"2024-02-08T19:48:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/"},"modified":"2024-02-08T14:48:20","modified_gmt":"2024-02-08T19:48:20","slug":"la-defense-de-trump-scotus-ne-nie-pas-linsurrection-et-insiste-sur-lexemption-presidentielle","status":"publish","type":"press","link":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/press\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/","title":{"rendered":"La d\u00e9fense de Trump devant la Cour supr\u00eame ne nie pas l&#039;insurrection, mais insiste sur l&#039;exemption pr\u00e9sidentielle"},"template":"","class_list":["post-15682","press","type-press","status-publish","hentry","press_type-press-release"],"acf":{"details":{"summary":"In our nation no one is above the law. Not even former presidents. It is telling that Donald Trump\u2019s lawyer in the Supreme Court today made no effort to assert that his client had not fomented an insurrection. He did not refute that Donald Trump on January 6 directed heavily-armed militants to go the Capitol to \u201cfight like hell\u201d to disrupt the certification of the 2020 presidential election as part of his attempt to deny the will of the people and steal the election. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0","featured_image":"","press_type":236,"authors":["{\"site_id\":\"1\",\"post_type\":\"person\",\"post_id\":7855}"],"related_issues":[149,169,2066,2082],"related_work":[185],"location":46},"sidebar":{"helper_enable_sidebar":false,"helper_media_contact":{"heading":"Media Contact","manually_enter_person":false,"person":null,"name":"","role":"","phone":"","email":""},"helper_links_downloads":{"heading":"Links & Downloads","links":null}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"Aujourd&#039;hui, la Cour supr\u00eame des \u00c9tats-Unis a entendu les plaidoiries orales de <em>Trump contre Anderson<\/em>, la contestation par l&#039;ancien pr\u00e9sident d&#039;une d\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame du Colorado qui l&#039;a jug\u00e9 in\u00e9ligible \u00e0 se pr\u00e9senter sur le bulletin de vote pr\u00e9sidentiel de l&#039;\u00c9tat. Common Cause a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 un m\u00e9moire d&#039;amicus curiae dans l&#039;affaire et a publi\u00e9 la d\u00e9claration suivante apr\u00e8s la fin du d\u00e9bat.\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>D\u00e9claration de Kathay Feng, vice-pr\u00e9sidente des programmes de Common Cause<\/strong><\/p>\r\nIn our nation no one is above the law. Not even former presidents. It is telling that Donald Trump\u2019s lawyer in the Supreme Court today made no effort to assert that his client had not fomented an insurrection. He did not refute that Donald Trump on January 6 directed heavily-armed militants to go the Capitol to \u201cfight like hell\u201d to disrupt the certification of the 2020 presidential election as part of his attempt to deny the will of the people and steal the election.\r\n\r\nSection 3 of the 14<sup>\u00e8me<\/sup> L&#039;amendement de la Constitution am\u00e9ricaine est clair. Si un pr\u00e9sident rompt son serment de soutenir la Constitution en fomentant une insurrection, cette personne ne peut pas exercer ses fonctions. Mais l&#039;avocat de Trump a fait valoir aux juges que \u00ab<em>m\u00eame si un candidat \u00e9tait un insurrectionnel avou\u00e9<\/em>&quot;, que le 14<sup>\u00e8me<\/sup> Amendment still allows that candidate to run for, and even win, office. This defies the U.S. Constitution.\r\n\r\nTrump\u2019s lawyer twisted and turned to create what Justice Sotomayor speculated was a \u201cgerrymandered rule\u201d \u201cdesigned to benefit only your client\u201d, and thus that the 14<sup>\u00e8me<\/sup> Amendment ban on insurrectionists should not apply to the president.\r\n\r\nIf the president is allowed to stage an insurrection in order to overturn an election that he lost, without consequence, we run the risk of descending into a future of dictators seizing power through coups. We cannot allow a candidate who broke his Constitutional oath by refusing to support a peaceful transfer of power, and instead fomenting an attack on the Capitol and stoking violence against election administrators and judicial officials, to defy the people\u2019s will and our rule of law. We are hopeful that the Supreme Court will recognize this ongoing threat as it weighs the pivotal case.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nTo read the Common Cause amicus brief in the case, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/23\/23-719\/299190\/20240130132143061_23-719%20Trump%20v%20Anderson%20Brief%20for%20Amicus%20Curiae%20Common%20Cause%20in%20Support%20of%20Respondents.pdf\">Cliquez ici<\/a>."}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Trump SCOTUS Defense Does not Deny Insurrection, Insists on Presidential Exemption - Common Cause<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/press-releases\/la-defense-de-trump-scotus-ne-nie-pas-linsurrection-et-insiste-sur-lexemption-presidentielle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trump SCOTUS Defense Does not Deny Insurrection, Insists on Presidential Exemption\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/presse\/la-defense-de-trump-scotus-ne-nie-pas-linsurrection-et-insiste-sur-lexemption-presidentielle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Common Cause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CommonCause\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/\",\"name\":\"Trump SCOTUS Defense Does not Deny Insurrection, Insists on Presidential Exemption - Common Cause\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-08T19:48:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trump SCOTUS Defense Does not Deny Insurrection, Insists on Presidential Exemption\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"width\":2066,\"height\":331,\"caption\":\"Common Cause\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"La d\u00e9fense de Trump devant la Cour supr\u00eame ne nie pas l&#039;insurrection, mais insiste sur l&#039;exemption pr\u00e9sidentielle - Common Cause","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/press-releases\/la-defense-de-trump-scotus-ne-nie-pas-linsurrection-et-insiste-sur-lexemption-presidentielle\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trump SCOTUS Defense Does not Deny Insurrection, Insists on Presidential Exemption","og_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/presse\/la-defense-de-trump-scotus-ne-nie-pas-linsurrection-et-insiste-sur-lexemption-presidentielle\/","og_site_name":"Common Cause","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@CommonCause","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/","name":"La d\u00e9fense de Trump devant la Cour supr\u00eame ne nie pas l&#039;insurrection, mais insiste sur l&#039;exemption pr\u00e9sidentielle - Common Cause","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-02-08T19:48:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/trump-scotus-defense-does-not-deny-insurrection-insists-on-presidential-exemption\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trump SCOTUS Defense Does not Deny Insurrection, Insists on Presidential Exemption"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","name":"Cause commune","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization","name":"Cause commune","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","width":2066,"height":331,"caption":"Common Cause"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/"]}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Common Cause","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/15682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/press"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/15682\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}