{"id":7908,"date":"2023-03-20T13:49:51","date_gmt":"2023-03-20T17:49:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/"},"modified":"2023-03-20T13:49:51","modified_gmt":"2023-03-20T17:49:51","slug":"scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper","status":"publish","type":"press","link":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/press\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","title":{"rendered":"Presentaci\u00f3n ante la Corte Suprema: los procedimientos en el caso de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos de Carolina del Norte no modifican la capacidad de decidir Moore v. Harper"},"template":"","class_list":["post-7908","press","type-press","status-publish","hentry","press_type-press-release"],"acf":{"details":{"summary":"The U.S. Supreme Court should reject the dangerous and fringe independent state legislature theory (ISLT) presented in Moore v. Harper regardless of the highly unusual decision by the North Carolina Supreme Court to rehear the remedial decision in Harper v. Hall, according to a new plaintiff\u2019s letter responding to the high court.  \r\n\r\n","featured_image":"","press_type":236,"authors":[null],"related_issues":[103,113,169,2066,2082],"related_work":false,"location":46},"sidebar":{"helper_enable_sidebar":false,"helper_media_contact":{"heading":"Media Contact","manually_enter_person":false,"person":null,"name":"","role":"","phone":"","email":""},"helper_links_downloads":{"heading":"Links & Downloads","links":null}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"WASHINGTON, DC \u2014 La Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos deber\u00eda rechazar la peligrosa y marginal teor\u00eda de la legislatura estatal independiente (ISLT, por sus siglas en ingl\u00e9s) presentada en\u00a0<em>Moore contra Harper<\/em>\u00a0independientemente de la decisi\u00f3n altamente inusual de la Corte Suprema de Carolina del Norte de volver a escuchar la decisi\u00f3n correctiva en\u00a0<em>Harper contra Hall<\/em>, according to a new plaintiff\u2019s letter responding to the high court.\r\n\r\n\u201cThis Court retains jurisdiction over this case regardless of the outcome of the North Carolina Supreme Court\u2019s rehearing proceedings in\u00a0<em>Harper II<\/em>\u201d, afirma la carta. \u201cLos peticionarios piden a este Tribunal que decida si los tribunales estatales pueden desempe\u00f1ar\u00a0<em>cualquier rol<\/em>\u00a0al decidir sobre los mapas de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos del Congreso. No importa c\u00f3mo decida la Corte Suprema de Carolina del Norte sobre la nueva audiencia\u00a0<em>Harper II<\/em>, esa cuesti\u00f3n seguir\u00e1 viva ante este Tribunal\u201d.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Moore-Supplemental-Brief-3-20-23-Final.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Lea la carta informativa complementaria completa aqu\u00ed.<\/a>\r\n\r\nLa Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos solicit\u00f3 informaci\u00f3n complementaria en\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0el 2 de marzo de 2023, preguntando a las partes cu\u00e1l fue el efecto sobre su jurisdicci\u00f3n despu\u00e9s de la nueva audiencia de la Corte Suprema de Carolina del Norte de la decisi\u00f3n del 16 de diciembre de 2022 en\u00a0<em>Harper contra Hall<\/em>Esa decisi\u00f3n,\u00a0<em>Harper II<\/em>, considered whether the remedial maps used in the 2022 election were still unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders.\r\n\r\nThe North Carolina Supreme Court\u2019s earlier February 2022 opinion,\u00a0<em>Harper yo<\/em>, anul\u00f3 los mapas legislativos y del Congreso estatales originales de 2021 promulgados por la legislatura de Carolina del Norte por considerarlos gerrymanders inconstitucionales, y es la decisi\u00f3n que fue apelada ante la Corte Suprema de los EE. UU. en\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>.\r\n\r\nOral arguments in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0tuvo lugar el 7 de diciembre de 2022. En ese momento, la Corte Suprema de Carolina del Norte ya hab\u00eda\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/north-carolina-supreme-court-rejects-gamesmanship-in-latest-redistricting-opinion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">rechaz\u00f3 el juego sucio en la elaboraci\u00f3n de mapas\u00a0<em>Harper II<\/em><\/a>\u00a0Al dictaminar que la manipulaci\u00f3n partidista de los distritos electorales se produjo de manera desproporcionada e inconstitucional a expensas de los votantes minoritarios del estado. Sin embargo, una vez que el tribunal de Carolina del Norte cambi\u00f3 la composici\u00f3n partidaria a principios de 2023,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/nc-supreme-court-majority-breaks-precedent-to-rehear-settled-redistricting-voter-id-cases-post-election\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">concedi\u00f3 una nueva audiencia de la decisi\u00f3n correctiva posterior<\/a>\u00a0emitido en diciembre a pedido de los legisladores republicanos. El momento de la nueva audiencia\u00a0<em>Harper yo<\/em>\u00a0is long past, but legislators have asked the North Carolina Supreme Court to overrule that decision as well.\r\n\r\nSome court watchers have questioned whether the move in North Carolina would moot the\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0caso. El escrito complementario presentado hoy por\u00a0<strong>Neal Kumar Katyal, socio de Hogan Lovells\u00a0<\/strong>y co-abogados con la Coalici\u00f3n Sure\u00f1a para la Justicia Social (SCSJ) en representaci\u00f3n del demandante Common Cause, expusieron por qu\u00e9 los procedimientos estatales no cambian la capacidad de la Corte Suprema de emitir una decisi\u00f3n en\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>:\r\n\r\n\u201cThis Court should not wait until this question comes before it on an emergency basis in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle,\u201d wrote Katyal, who also argued the case before the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in December 2022. \u201cThe question presented is fully briefed, thoroughly argued, and ripe for decision. This Court is the only forum that can definitively resolve that question and provide guidance to state legislatures and state courts across the country.\u201d\r\n\r\nVoting rights advocates have called\u00a0<em>De Moore<\/em>\u00a0ISLT argument a grave threat to democracy. The legislators who subscribe to this theory pervert the Elections Clause in the U.S. Constitution to assert that state legislatures alone have the power to determine how federal district maps should be drawn, and furthermore that state courts cannot intervene in that process, nor can state constitutions be enforced if they are contrary to the will of a group of lawmakers who seek to entrench their power.\r\n\r\n\u201cWe knew from the start this brazen power grab was wrong and flew in the faces of the U.S and North Carolina Constitutions,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Bob Phillips, director ejecutivo de Common Cause North Carolina<\/strong>. \u201cNothing has changed on that front. We need the U.S. Supreme Court to toss this nonsensical \u2018independent state legislature theory\u2019 into the dustbin where it belongs \u2014 and there is no better time than now when we aren\u2019t on the eve of a major election.\u201d\r\n\r\nOral arguments in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0lasted three and a half hours, a lengthy period of time in which the U.S. Supreme Court Justices examined the flimsy legal underpinnings of the dangerous ISLT that would erode people\u2019s voting rights.\r\n\r\n\u201cISLT was wrong when this matter was briefed and argued before the Supreme Court in 2022, and it remains wrong in 2023,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Hilary Harris Klein, asesora principal de derechos de voto en SCSJ<\/strong>. \u201cNothing that has happened in the state proceedings has changed this fact, and the arguments and briefing show definitively that voters deserve an unambiguous rejection of this dangerous theory by our country\u2019s highest court.\u201d\r\n\r\nA decision in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0is expected early this summer.\r\n\r\n\u201cChecks and balances were embedded throughout our Constitution to prevent any one person, group or political party from unjustly seizing power that rightly belongs to the people,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Kathay Feng, vicepresidenta de programas de Common Cause<\/strong>\u201cLa Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, cuando publique su decisi\u00f3n dentro de unos meses, debe rechazar este intento imprudente de otorgar a los legisladores estatales un poder ilimitado para manipular nuestras elecciones\u201d.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/north-carolina\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Causa com\u00fan<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0es una organizaci\u00f3n de base no partidista dedicada a defender los valores fundamentales de la democracia estadounidense. Trabajamos para crear un gobierno abierto, honesto y responsable que sirva al inter\u00e9s p\u00fablico; promover la igualdad de derechos, oportunidades y representaci\u00f3n para todos; y empoderar a todas las personas para que hagan o\u00edr su voz en el proceso pol\u00edtico.<\/em>\r\n\r\n<em>La Coalici\u00f3n Sure\u00f1a para la Justicia Social, fundada en 2007, colabora con comunidades de color y comunidades econ\u00f3micamente desfavorecidas del Sur para defender y promover sus derechos pol\u00edticos, sociales y econ\u00f3micos mediante la combinaci\u00f3n de defensa legal, investigaci\u00f3n, organizaci\u00f3n y comunicaciones. Obtenga m\u00e1s informaci\u00f3n en\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.southerncoalition.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>coalici\u00f3nsur.org<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0y sigue nuestro trabajo en\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/scsj\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Gorjeo<\/em><\/a><em>,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/southerncoalition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Facebook<\/em><\/a><em>, y\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/scsjofficial\/?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Instagram<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em>"}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/prensa\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Common Cause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CommonCause\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\",\"name\":\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-20T17:49:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"width\":2066,\"height\":331,\"caption\":\"Common Cause\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper","og_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/prensa\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","og_site_name":"Common Cause","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@CommonCause","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","name":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-03-20T17:49:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","name":"Causa com\u00fan","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization","name":"Causa com\u00fan","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","width":2066,"height":331,"caption":"Common Cause"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/"]}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Common Cause","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/7908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/press"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/7908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7908"}],"curies":[{"name":"Gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}