As Wall Street Profits Rise, Students Left Underwater

As Wall Street Profits Rise, Students Left Underwater

Opponents of the Democracy for All amendment to overturn Citizens United and restore limits on special interest campaign spending argue that the amendment will “limit speech.” That’s wrong. It will lift the voices of millions who are facing student loan debt by giving them a more equal say in our political system and limit the influence of outside special interests seeking to profit their debt.

No one needs to tell a recent college graduate that student loan debt is one of the most serious economic problems facing the United States today. At over $1.2 trillion, our nation’s student loan debt has surpassed the amount of credit card and auto loan debt Americans hold. Meanwhile, 5 million student loan borrowers are in default, more than half of recent college graduates are unemployed, and college tuition cost continues to rise. In the time between just 2011 and May 2013, student loan debt had shot up 20 percent.

While college students and graduates face mounting debt that threatens to ignite another economic crisis, Congress has failed to act on the issue, hamstrung by obstruction and gridlock. At the same time, members of Congress have taken millions in political contributions from the corporations and banks that profit the most from this country’s mounting student loan debt.

One plan to fix the student loan crisis, titled Higher Ed Not Debt, includes providing additional support to borrows and changing funding structures, but that plan has not moved in Congress. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s bill to allow an estimated 25 million people with student loans to refinance their interest rates also stalled earlier this year when the Senate minority blocked it with a filibuster.  

According to a report by Maplight, the Senators who voted against Senator Warren’s student loan bill earlier this year received 58% more political contributions from banks, lending institutions, and student loan companies than the Senators voting for it. Senator Mitch McConnell, a strong opponent of Warren’s bill, was the largest recipient of funding from banks, lending institutions, and student loan corporations with nearly $1 million in funding since 2001.  

One of the major corporations making money off student loan debt is Sallie Mae, which owns about 20% of all student loan debt. Since 1992, Sallie Mae (SLM Corp) has spent over $7.4 million on political contributions to members of Congress and over $37.6 million on lobbying.  The result? Sallie Mae has a stronger voice in Congress than the 37 million Americans saddled with student loan debt. Americans with student loan debt are largely unable to renegotiate their set interest rates with Sallie Mae, and student loan debt is barred from being included when one declares financial bankruptcy.

Sallie Mae is not the only corporation profiting from student loans. It is estimated that Wall Street companies make an average of $45 billion off higher education each year, and much of this is attributed to student loan debt. Fox Business recently reported that Wall Street banks and financial corporations are increasingly exploiting student loan debt as a new potential revenue stream.

These same banks and corporations are also some of the biggest contributors in our political system. Data from the Center for Responsive Politics shows that in the 2008 election, Wall Street institutions funneled over $55.9 million to Members of Congress. What’s more interesting, though, is that the amount Wall Street spent on elections nearly doubled in 2012 after the Citizens United decision, to over $108 million. In the 2014 cycle alone, Wall Street banks and financial corporations have already pumped $51.% million into the election, a huge increase over the last midterm election in 2010 ($39.4 million).

It seems the special interest group with the most money has the loudest voice in Congress. When Wall Street faced financial catastrophe and needed Congress to act quickly, Congress complied. Wall Street banks enjoy a small 0.75% interest rate when borrowing money from the Federal Reserve, as compared to the 6.8% interest rate on federal student loans.

Opponents of the Democracy for All amendment to overturn Citizens United and restore limits on special interest campaign spending argue that the amendment will “limit speech.” That’s wrong. It will lift the voices of millions who are facing student loan debt by giving them a more equal say in our political system and limit the influence of outside special interests seeking to profit their debt. 

[Common Cause analyzed data from the Center for Responsive Politics on total spending by the following industries: Mortgage Banking, Hedge Funds, Finance/Credit Companies, Commercial Banks, Private Equity & Investors]