{"id":7908,"date":"2023-03-20T13:49:51","date_gmt":"2023-03-20T17:49:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/"},"modified":"2023-03-20T13:49:51","modified_gmt":"2023-03-20T17:49:51","slug":"scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper","status":"publish","type":"press","link":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/press\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS-Einreichung: Verfahren im Fall der Neugliederung der Wahlbezirke in North Carolina \u00e4ndert nichts an der Entscheidungsbefugnis im Fall Moore v. Harper"},"template":"","class_list":["post-7908","press","type-press","status-publish","hentry","press_type-press-release"],"acf":{"details":{"summary":"The U.S. Supreme Court should reject the dangerous and fringe independent state legislature theory (ISLT) presented in Moore v. Harper regardless of the highly unusual decision by the North Carolina Supreme Court to rehear the remedial decision in Harper v. Hall, according to a new plaintiff\u2019s letter responding to the high court.  \r\n\r\n","featured_image":"","press_type":236,"authors":[null],"related_issues":[103,113,169,2066,2082],"related_work":false,"location":46},"sidebar":{"helper_enable_sidebar":false,"helper_media_contact":{"heading":"Media Contact","manually_enter_person":false,"person":null,"name":"","role":"","phone":"","email":""},"helper_links_downloads":{"heading":"Links & Downloads","links":null}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"WASHINGTON, DC \u2014 Der Oberste Gerichtshof der USA sollte die gef\u00e4hrliche und abwegige Theorie der unabh\u00e4ngigen staatlichen Gesetzgebung (ISLT) zur\u00fcckweisen, die in\u00a0<em>Moore gegen Harper<\/em>\u00a0ungeachtet der h\u00f6chst ungew\u00f6hnlichen Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichtshofs von North Carolina, die Abhilfeentscheidung erneut zu verhandeln\u00a0<em>Harper gegen Hall<\/em>, according to a new plaintiff\u2019s letter responding to the high court.\r\n\r\n\u201cThis Court retains jurisdiction over this case regardless of the outcome of the North Carolina Supreme Court\u2019s rehearing proceedings in\u00a0<em>Harfner II<\/em>\u201d, hei\u00dft es in dem Brief. \u201cDie Antragsteller bitten dieses Gericht, zu entscheiden, ob staatliche Gerichte\u00a0<em>jede Rolle<\/em>\u00a0bei der Entscheidung \u00fcber die Neugliederung der Kongresswahlbezirke. Unabh\u00e4ngig davon, wie der Oberste Gerichtshof von North Carolina \u00fcber die Wiederaufnahme des\u00a0<em>Harfner II<\/em>, wird diese Frage vor diesem Gericht weiterhin aktuell bleiben.\u201c\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Moore-Supplemental-Brief-3-20-23-Final.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Lesen Sie hier das vollst\u00e4ndige erg\u00e4nzende Briefing.<\/a>\r\n\r\nDer Oberste Gerichtshof der USA forderte erg\u00e4nzende Informationen in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0am 2. M\u00e4rz 2023, in dem die Parteien gefragt werden, welche Auswirkungen die erneute Anh\u00f6rung der Entscheidung vom 16. Dezember 2022 durch den Obersten Gerichtshof von North Carolina auf seine Zust\u00e4ndigkeit hatte.\u00a0<em>Harper gegen Hall<\/em>. Diese Entscheidung\u00a0<em>Harfner II<\/em>, considered whether the remedial maps used in the 2022 election were still unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders.\r\n\r\nThe North Carolina Supreme Court\u2019s earlier February 2022 opinion,\u00a0<em>Harper I<\/em>, hob die urspr\u00fcnglichen Karten f\u00fcr die gesetzgebenden K\u00f6rperschaften des Staates und des Kongresses von 2021, die von der gesetzgebenden K\u00f6rperschaft von North Carolina verabschiedet wurden, als verfassungswidrige Wahlkreismanipulation auf, und es handelt sich um die Entscheidung, die vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der USA angefochten wurde, in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>.\r\n\r\nOral arguments in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0fand am 7. Dezember 2022 statt. Zu diesem Zeitpunkt hatte der Oberste Gerichtshof von North Carolina bereits\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/north-carolina-supreme-court-rejects-gamesmanship-in-latest-redistricting-opinion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">lehnte Taktiken bei der Kartenerstellung ab in\u00a0<em>Harfner II<\/em><\/a>\u00a0indem er entschied, dass die parteiische Wahlkreismanipulation unverh\u00e4ltnism\u00e4\u00dfig und verfassungswidrig zu Lasten der Minderheitsw\u00e4hler im Staat ging. Als das Gericht in North Carolina jedoch Anfang 2023 die parteiische Zusammensetzung \u00e4nderte,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/southerncoalition.org\/nc-supreme-court-majority-breaks-precedent-to-rehear-settled-redistricting-voter-id-cases-post-election\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">eine erneute Anh\u00f6rung der sp\u00e4teren Abhilfeentscheidung gew\u00e4hrt<\/a>\u00a0im Dezember auf Antrag der republikanischen Abgeordneten erlassen. Der Zeitpunkt f\u00fcr die erneute Anh\u00f6rung\u00a0<em>Harper I<\/em>\u00a0is long past, but legislators have asked the North Carolina Supreme Court to overrule that decision as well.\r\n\r\nSome court watchers have questioned whether the move in North Carolina would moot the\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0Fall. Der heute eingereichte erg\u00e4nzende Schriftsatz von\u00a0<strong>Neal Kumar Katyal, Partner bei Hogan Lovells\u00a0<\/strong>und Co-Counsel der Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ), die den Kl\u00e4ger Common Cause vertritt, legen dar, warum das staatliche Verfahren die F\u00e4higkeit des Obersten Gerichtshofs, eine Entscheidung zu treffen, nicht \u00e4ndert\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>:\r\n\r\n\u201cThis Court should not wait until this question comes before it on an emergency basis in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle,\u201d wrote Katyal, who also argued the case before the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in December 2022. \u201cThe question presented is fully briefed, thoroughly argued, and ripe for decision. This Court is the only forum that can definitively resolve that question and provide guidance to state legislatures and state courts across the country.\u201d\r\n\r\nVoting rights advocates have called\u00a0<em>Moores<\/em>\u00a0ISLT argument a grave threat to democracy. The legislators who subscribe to this theory pervert the Elections Clause in the U.S. Constitution to assert that state legislatures alone have the power to determine how federal district maps should be drawn, and furthermore that state courts cannot intervene in that process, nor can state constitutions be enforced if they are contrary to the will of a group of lawmakers who seek to entrench their power.\r\n\r\n\u201cWe knew from the start this brazen power grab was wrong and flew in the faces of the U.S and North Carolina Constitutions,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Bob Phillips, Gesch\u00e4ftsf\u00fchrer von Common Cause North Carolina<\/strong>. \u201cNothing has changed on that front. We need the U.S. Supreme Court to toss this nonsensical \u2018independent state legislature theory\u2019 into the dustbin where it belongs \u2014 and there is no better time than now when we aren\u2019t on the eve of a major election.\u201d\r\n\r\nOral arguments in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0lasted three and a half hours, a lengthy period of time in which the U.S. Supreme Court Justices examined the flimsy legal underpinnings of the dangerous ISLT that would erode people\u2019s voting rights.\r\n\r\n\u201cISLT was wrong when this matter was briefed and argued before the Supreme Court in 2022, and it remains wrong in 2023,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Hilary Harris Klein, leitende Rechtsberaterin f\u00fcr Wahlrechte bei SCSJ<\/strong>. \u201cNothing that has happened in the state proceedings has changed this fact, and the arguments and briefing show definitively that voters deserve an unambiguous rejection of this dangerous theory by our country\u2019s highest court.\u201d\r\n\r\nA decision in\u00a0<em>Moore<\/em>\u00a0is expected early this summer.\r\n\r\n\u201cChecks and balances were embedded throughout our Constitution to prevent any one person, group or political party from unjustly seizing power that rightly belongs to the people,\u201d said\u00a0<strong>Kathay Feng, Vizepr\u00e4sidentin f\u00fcr Programme bei Common Cause<\/strong>\u201eWenn der Oberste Gerichtshof der USA in einigen Monaten seine Entscheidung verk\u00fcndet, muss er diesen r\u00fccksichtslosen Versuch zur\u00fcckweisen, den Gesetzgebern der Bundesstaaten uneingeschr\u00e4nkte Macht zur Manipulation unserer Wahlen zu geben.\u201c\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/north-carolina\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Gemeinsame Ursache<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0ist eine \u00fcberparteiliche Basisorganisation, die sich f\u00fcr die Wahrung der Grundwerte der amerikanischen Demokratie einsetzt. Wir arbeiten daran, eine offene, ehrliche und rechenschaftspflichtige Regierung zu schaffen, die dem \u00f6ffentlichen Interesse dient, gleiche Rechte, Chancen und Vertretung f\u00fcr alle f\u00f6rdert und allen Menschen die M\u00f6glichkeit gibt, ihre Stimme im politischen Prozess zu Geh\u00f6r zu bringen.<\/em>\r\n\r\n<em>Die Southern Coalition for Social Justice wurde 2007 gegr\u00fcndet und arbeitet mit farbigen und wirtschaftlich benachteiligten Gemeinschaften im S\u00fcden zusammen, um deren politische, soziale und wirtschaftliche Rechte durch eine Kombination aus Rechtsbeistand, Forschung, Organisation und Kommunikation zu verteidigen und zu f\u00f6rdern. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.southerncoalition.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>www.southerncoalition.org<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0und verfolgen Sie unsere Arbeit auf\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/scsj\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>\u00dej\u00f3rs\u00e1rden<\/em><\/a><em>,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/southerncoalition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>auf facebook.<\/em><\/a><em>, Und\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/scsjofficial\/?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Instagram<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em>"}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/drucken\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Common Cause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CommonCause\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\",\"name\":\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-20T17:49:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Common Cause\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png\",\"width\":2066,\"height\":331,\"caption\":\"Common Cause\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper","og_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/drucken\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","og_site_name":"Common Cause","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CC-Share-Graphic-Main9.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@CommonCause","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/","name":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper - Common Cause","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-03-20T17:49:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/press-releases\/scotus-filing-proceedings-in-nc-redistricting-case-do-not-change-ability-to-decide-moore-v-harper\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SCOTUS Filing: Proceedings in NC Redistricting Case Do Not Change Ability to Decide Moore v. Harper"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","name":"Gemeinsame Ursache","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#organization","name":"Gemeinsame Ursache","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Common-Cause-Logo.png","width":2066,"height":331,"caption":"Common Cause"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/x.com\/CommonCause","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ourcommoncause\/"]}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Common Cause","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/7908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/press"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press\/7908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.commoncause.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}