Research Center

Fracking-Related Campaign Contributions
in Southern Tier Elections

Analysis finds pro-fracking interests donated nearly $400,000 in 10 races
(download PDF report here)

 

In the 2012 election cycle, pro-fracking interests contributed a combined total of nearly $400,000 to candidates for state legislature and county executive in New York’s Southern Tier.

 

Although incumbents uniformly prevailed, the natural gas industry and its boosters have attempted to frame these results as a “mandate” in support of fracking.[1] The more likely analysis is that the trappings of entrenched incumbency, such as name recognition and an established fundraising apparatus, determined the outcome.[2] However, in some cases pro-fracking contributions made up over 20% of the candidate’s total fundraising.

 

It’s unclear exactly what role fracking played in the minds of Southern Tier voters. But, by examining campaign finance records, this analysis reveals the role of the fracking industry and its boosters in relation to their preferred candidates.

 

Common Cause/NY’s analysis uses a broad definition of “fracking money” which includes the entire spectrum of industry interests and boosters rather than only the natural gas production sector, such as: engineering firms, construction industry organizations, unions, law firms with oil and gas practices, freight rail and trucking interests, and other member companies and entities of pro-fracking organizations like Clean Growth Now or Unshackle Upstate. All of the interests included in this dataset are either directly involved in the business of fracking and gas field development, or on the record in support of expanding natural gas production.

 

KEY FINDINGS

 

Fracking interests and boosters strongly supported incumbent lawmakers over challengers, regardless of party affiliation. All incumbents easily won re-election by 20 points or more.

 

 

    • Broome County Executive Debbie Preston (R) ($82,428 or 22% of total) and State Senator Thomas Libous (R) ($190,700, 15% of total) received the most money from fracking-related sources, with contributions from a wide array of interests including gas industry PACs, drillers, engineers, construction unions, and asphalt and gravel companies.
      • Preston’s opponent Tarik Abdelazim (D) ran an explicitly anti-fracking campaign, and Libous’ opponent John Orzel (D) was less supportive and more cautious on the issue than the incumbent. Both candidates predictably received very little support from fracking interests and boosters.
    • Assemblywoman Donna Lupardo (D) ($16,631 or 15% of total) received significant contributions from fracking boosters including construction unions, oil & gas law firms, and the commercial trucking lobby, despite her cautious stance that neither firmly opposes or supports fracking.
      • Lupardo’s opponent, Julie Lewis (R) received almost no support from fracking interests and boosters despite a strongly pro-fracking position.[3]
    • With the exception of Assemblyman Christopher Friend (R) who largely abstains from fundraising, the other incumbents in the Southern Tier state legislature all received a significant portion of their campaign contributions (between 9% and 14% of all funds raised) from fracking-related sources.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A detailed spreadsheet including documented descriptions for all 113 contributors included in this analysis is available here. 

 

For questions/comments contact Research and Policy Coordinator Brian Paul at bpaul@commoncause.org