Election Reform

Audits

 

 

Click here to download a factsheet.

Click here to view the full text of the bill.

 

The problem.

The increasing presence of touch screen voting has led to a decreasing sense of trust in the accuracy and security of voting. Many people fear that elections are being lost or stolen due to either technological errors or intentional tampering. In 2004, the president of Diebold Election Systems, a corporation that manufactures touch screen voting equipment, said he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." This is an indefensible statement by a figure who should be helping to instill confidence in voters rather than to diminish it. The inability of many direct recording electronic devices to be audited only adds to voters' outrage and mistrust.  

 

The solution.

Keep the current optical scan paper ballots. An alternative and simple solution, if we must adopt touch-screen machines is to require touch screen or similar voting equipment to print out paper records of every vote. Encourage voters to check their record against the votes they have cast. Store these "paper audit trails" in a secure location for auditing or recounting.

 

Why Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trails?

  • They are a simple solution to ensuring that election results are accurate.
  • They allow disabled and foreign-language voters to continue to vote independently while protecting elections from preventable fraud and errors.
  • They increase voter confidence by assuring voters that their votes are accounted for and by bringing transparency to the electoral process.
  • ATMs print out receipts and are constantly audited; there is no reason why our elections shouldn't be held to the same standard.
  • 22 other states have enacted legislation requiring secure voting equipment; Massachusetts should follow in their example and improve the quality of its elections.

 

See a map of verified voting jurisdictions across the U.S!