Who draws the lines?: A Case for Independent Redistricting
In
Having the legislators in control of their own redistricting has lead to a history of both parties manipulating the demographics that they control in a way that allows them to gain electoral advantage and eliminate meaningful competition. Incumbents can draw their district lines to include the areas in which they (or their parties) are popular and exclude the areas in they are not. Both Democrats and Republicans buy into this practice, which ultimately leads to:
• Protected incumbents
• Lines being draw without regard to city, town or county boundaries (see 2002 map below as example)
• Unnecessary mid-decade district changes
• Protected politicians who are less accountable to the people and more responsive to partisan issues. This causes difficulty gaining consensus around issues facing all Georgians
Common Cause Georgia has long advocated for the establishment of an independent redistricting commission that would prevent sitting legislators from determining their own districts. We have asked for the creation of an organization that could draw the district lines after each census in a more fair and neutral manner. Common Cause
![]() |
|
Gerrymandered districts drawn after the 2000 census. Later revised by Republicans in 2005 |
The legislation recommends transferring Georgia's redistricting process from the General Assembly to an independent commission. Unfortunately the legislation never made it out of committee.
In January 2008 the AJC reported that Georgia is expected to gain one Congressional seat after the 2010 census. With this in mind, we urged the 2008 General Assembly to adopt Governor Perdue's plan for independent redistricting (SR 344) again to no avail.
Common Cause salutes Governor Perdue for taking the lead in offering this significant reform for


