On the heels of releasing new polling on money in politics in New Mexico, today we release our latest research that tracks and analyzes Political Action Committee (PAC) contributions and spending in New Mexico from 2005 to 2012. Our research shows a dramatic increase in spending from out-of-state PACs, a shift away from party-centric PACs, and layers upon layers of concealed funders through PAC-to-PAC contributions.

 

The report and reforms recommended can be found here, and you can see the data we used here. The raw data was provided by the New Mexico Secretary of State’s (SoS) Office.

 

"As you will see in our infographic, New Mexico PACs: Growth, Influence, and Shifting Interests, contributions to and spending by PACs has nearly doubled since the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission," says CCNM’s executive director Viki Harrison.

 

Some additional key findings from our analysis include:

 

Between 2005 and 2012 New Mexico PACs spent almost $45 million on political campaigns

 

A shift from party dominated PACs to ideological PACs over the years analyzed

 

About 70-80% of contributions to New Mexico PACs were from companies or other PACs

 

PACs donating to other PACs, effectively concealing the true entities making contributions

 

Between 2005 and 2012 total contributions from outside New Mexico have nearly doubled

 

PACs spending the most in New Mexico politics are primarily funded by organizations outside the state, mostly from Washington D.C.

 

Your support is critical to our good work, and I am asking you to please give generously so that we can execute our ambitious agenda. Our democracy works much better when the people are involved every step of the way – and with your help, CCNM will be there!


 

Please consider making a generous donation to Common Cause New Mexico today! 

 

Viki Harrison

and the rest of the team at Common Cause New Mexico

You can also mail a contribution to: Common Cause New Mexico, P.O. Box 278, Albuquerque, NM 87103.


Search
 
Today's Poll
The threat of a filibuster now requires every bill in the Senate to get 60 votes instead of a simple majority. Do you think it's time to reform or end the filibuster?
Reform It.
End It.
Leave it as-is.
Connect

 

facebook   Twitter   YouTube