For Immediate Release Court decision shows narrow view of First Amendment

Posted on June 26, 2008

The Supreme Court today, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the so-called Millionaire's Amendment to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), the landmark campaign finance reform law known as McCain-Feingold that banned soft money to the national political parties.

The Millionaires' Amendment allowed candidates for Congress to accept larger contributions than otherwise permitted if they were running against opponents who spent large amounts of personal wealth on the campaign, under certain circumstances.

The striking down of the amendment as unconstitutional does not affect the soft money ban that McCain-Feingold put in place and that the court ruled earlier is constitutional.

It does, however, show the court's increasingly narrow view of the First Amendment as it relates to campaign finance.

Office: Common Cause National

Issues: Money in Politics

Tags: Fighting Big Money

Common Cause is a nonpartisan grassroots organization dedicated to upholding the core values of American democracy. We work to create open, honest, and accountable government that serves the public interest; promote equal rights, opportunity, and representation for all; and empower all people to make their voices heard in the political process.

Leave a Comment

Take Action

The Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

Tell Congress to fix the court’s bad decision!

Take action.


Give Today