Appeals Court Ruling for Plaintiffs in Sanchez v. Modesto, ruling on the California Voting Rights Act os 2001

December 6, 2006

Ruling for plantiff in Sanchez V. Modesto. The trial court granted the defense?s motion for judgment on the pleadings after ruling that the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 was facially invalid under the equal protection clauses of the state and federal Constitutions. It entered judgment against plaintiff Latino voters, who allege that, because of racially polarized voting in Modesto, they are precluded from electing any candidates in the city?s at-large city council elections. No evidence has been presented in support of or in opposition to this claim. Rather, at a preliminary stage of the litigation, the trial court struck down the CVRA, ruling that any possible application would necessarily involve unconstitutional racial discrimination. As we will explain, Modesto?s arguments do not support disposing of the Legislature?s act in this summary manner.

READ: CA_120606_Decision_For_Plaintiffs_In_Sanchez_v_Modesto.pdf.pdf

Leave a Comment

Take Action

The Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

Tell Congress to fix the court’s bad decision!

Take action.


Give Today

Join the Community

Find Common Cause Activists in your area.

Add Me to the Map