After the Supreme Court removed barriers to corporate political spending in the 2010 Citizens United case, members of Congress introduced the DISCLOSE Act to help citizens keep track of who is spending money to influence our votes and elected officials. While donations made directly to candidates and parties generally are reported already, some "independent" groups are pumping millions of dollars from secret donors into TV ads supporting some candidates and opposing others. DISCLOSE would require reporting of contributions exceeding $10,000 to those groups and would apply equally to corporate and labor union spending.

DISCLOSE passed the House in 2010 but was stalled by a filibuster in the Senate, where it received 59 votes, a substantial majority but one vote short of the 60 needed to secure passage.

Latest Status

Last week I took a break from my regular routine in Los Angeles by packing up and shipping out to hold power accountable from the source, California’s State Capitol; Sacramento. After stopping to take a quick selfie with our...

Defending Democracy and Delivering Disclosure
Leila Pedersen, July 2, 2014

The Boston Globe editorial board rightly called on the Massachusetts State Legislature to “alter campaign finance laws to thwart outside spending” in elections. As the editorial board correctly notes, “spending by outside groups...

The Globe is right to call for more disclosure of political spending
Tyler Creighton, June 27, 2014

Democracy Wire

Posted on Jul 3 at 12:00 AM 0 comments Tags: Disclosure

Take Action

The Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

Tell Congress to fix the court’s bad decision!

Take action.


Give Today

When the little guy
wins, it’s likely that
Common Cause
had something
to do with
the victory.

- St. Petersburg Times

Our Impact