Supreme Court Signs Off on New Pennsylvania Districts

Justices Accept Districts Drawn By State's Highest Court

Posted by Dale Eisman on March 20, 2018

The 7th District of PA was grossly gerrymandered

Pennsylvanians will vote this spring and in November in congressional districts that have been re-fashioned to wipe out a bias for Republican candidates, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on Monday.

An apparently unanimous court declined to take up a legal challenge to the new districts, which were drawn by an independent consultant supervised by Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court. The state tribunal had ruled that the previous districts, drawn by the Republican-controlled state legislature, discriminated against Democratic voters.

While the Pennsylvania electorate is roughly evenly divided – Democratic and Republican congressional candidates usually get about the same number of votes statewide – the legislature-drawn districts were gerrymandered to produce a 13-5 Republican advantage in the state’s delegation to the House of Representatives.

The state ruling was based on provisions in the Pennsylvania Constitution; the U.S. Supreme Court rarely intervenes in such cases, leaving them to the highest court in the state.

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling was a victory for Pennsylvania voters who will now be able to cast ballots for congressional candidates in districts not unconstitutionally manipulated to make them uncompetitive,” said Micah Sims, Common Cause Pennsylvania’s executive director.

The ruling came just one day before today’s deadline for congressional candidates in all 18 Pennsylvania districts to file for the scheduled May 15 primary elections. Officials indicated that if the court had intervened and forced a delay in the election schedule, the cost to taxpayers would have been about $20 million.

The decision also comes as the Supreme Court considers gerrymandering cases in Wisconsin and Maryland; the Wisconsin case is a challenge to Republican-drawn districts in that state, while the Maryland case involves a Democratic-drawn district that was configured to unseat a Republican representing heavily GOP counties in the western part of the state.

Those cases, and a third gerrymandering challenge, Common Cause v. Rucho, making its way to the high court, invite the justices to put limits on the role of partisan considerations in drawing congressional and legislative districts. More details on the Rucho case and redistricting generally are available here and here.




Office: Common Cause Maryland, Common Cause National, Common Cause North Carolina, Common Cause Pennsylvania, Common Cause Wisconsin

Issues: Voting and Elections

Tags: Redistricting, Common Cause v. Rucho

Leave a Comment

  Get news & updates






If you respond and have not already registered, you will receive periodic updates and communications from Common Cause.


What's this?

   Please leave this field empty

Take Action

The Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

Tell Congress to fix the court’s bad decision!

Take action.


Give Today

Join the Community

Find Common Cause Activists in your area.

Add Me to the Map