New York Times Joins Fight Against Partisan Gerrymandering

Written by Scott Zimmerman on May 30, 2017


The New York Times is joining Common Cause’s fight against partisan gerrymandering.

In an editorial published this morning, the paper argues that voters should pick their representatives, not the other way around. The editors write that partisan gerrymandering, specifically in North Carolina, is entangled with racial gerrymandering, and that the problem is consistent throughout the south.

“Self-interested politicians have no business making maps with the sole purpose of keeping themselves and their party in power,” the editorial asserts. The Times’ stance reflects the growing support for ending this system of protecting incumbents.

The editorial argues that partisan gerrymandering is not simply a tool of political warfare; it is method of rigging elections to protect incumbents. “How are “the losers” supposed to fight on a battlefield that the winners have systematically tilted against them?” the editors ask.

Read the full editorial here. To see why Common Cause is challenging partisan gerrymandering in court, check out our fact sheet on Common Cause vs Rucho. The courts must hold power accountable, for legislators naturally look out for their own interests.

###

Office: Common Cause National, Common Cause North Carolina

Issues: Voting and Elections

Tags: Redistricting, Common Cause v. Rucho

Leave a Comment

  Get news & updates

 

 

*

 

 

If you respond and have not already registered, you will receive periodic updates and communications from Common Cause.

 

What's this?

   Please leave this field empty

Take Action

The Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

Tell Congress to fix the court’s bad decision!

Take action.

Donate

Give Today