The Cause at the Dome 

                         CCGA Recap of Legislative Activity, Feb. 23-27

 

The General Assembly continued its 3-day week, with session days Tuesday through Thursday. Committee meetings are held on Monday, with Friday a day to go back to the district for many legislators.

 

Much of the high profile news from the capitol this week centered on the passage of the "Georgia Power" bill, SB31, which gives the utility rights to charge its rate payers up front for its investment in additional nuclear power plants.  The bill passed the House this week without changes, so it will go to the Governor shortly to become law. The vote in the House was quite interesting, not along party lines at all. An eclectic coalition against, but the majority solidly for this controversial legislation. Common Cause did not engage in the debate on this bill. Without considering whether it is a good decision or not, it was an exceptional display of one of Georgia's largest special interest groups getting special treatment.

 

We had some good progress on Top Ten Reforms this week:

 

Senate Bill 96, which requires local government to instate ethics panels, passed out of the Senate Ethics Committee on Thursday. Next stop - rules committee, where we expect no problems.

 

Rep. Edward Lindsey's judicial election reform bill HB 601 was dropped on Wednesday. This is the legislation that came out of the study committee in December. We will be following this bill as it goes through the committee process. 

 

The enabling legislation for last fall's Constitutional Amendment 2 (The TAD amendment) emerged in its new form on Wednesday. HB 63 has undergone a substantial rewrite from the original bill as sponsor Earl Erhart tried to accommodate a number of stakeholders who - well - "have a stake" in the issue. The substitute for HB 63, not yet on-line, is a total re-write of Title 36, chapter 44, the Redevelopment Powers Law. This substitute bill was heard by a Governmental Affairs sub-committee on Wednesday. They passed the bill on to full committee with commitments that a number of questions raised could be resolved by modifying language. Bill Bozarth testified before the committee. What we see is a bill that is a good step in limiting the definition of property that qualifies for TAD funding, but is still more open than we would like. We will continue to follow the bill in full committee next week.

 

The Independent Redistricting legislation HR 229 gets its first committee hearing on Monday 3-2. Common Cause and John Sours.